Ferenta stolliana (Stoll, 1782)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5148.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20BC627E-56A1-4674-A6B2-96F9B8DB15F7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6605725 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/ED434E3C-FFF0-FFCF-FF71-FEF5FCA7FD5F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ferenta stolliana (Stoll, 1782) |
status |
|
Ferenta stolliana (Stoll, 1782)
( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 : E–F, 18: F, 23: I, 28: P, 30: G, 90: E–F, H)
This species differs from F. incaya by the dorsal hindwing orange band not reaching the wing margin, and this band is narrower than in F. cacica . Ferenta stolliana was described as having violet tints in the forewings and ebony blue hues on the hindwings and was illustrated in Cramer (1782) Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 : P)). It was described from Suriname and ranges from Costa Rica south to Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia and east to Suriname near the French Guiana border.
The description of Darceta (Ferenta) castula Dognin was based on one female specimen from Venezuela in the heart of the F. stolliana distribution range. The description refers to a large orange hindwing spot as in cacica , but thinner and less oval ( Dognin 1912). This agrees with F. stolliana . The fact that Dognin (1912) compared F. castula to F. cacica but not F. stolliana (which also has a thinner, less ovuloid hindwing band), suggests that Dognin was unaware of the latter species. He also described castula as having bluish tinted forewings and ebony blue hues on the hindwings, which also agrees with F. stolliana . We are unaware of any difference between F. stolliana and F. castula , and thus consider F. castula a syn. nov. of F. stolliana .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |