Eudocima iridescens (Lucus, 1894)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5148.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20BC627E-56A1-4674-A6B2-96F9B8DB15F7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7635991 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/ED434E3C-FFE7-FFD8-FF71-FC58FB1DFB0E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eudocima iridescens (Lucus, 1894) |
status |
|
Eudocima iridescens (Lucus, 1894)
( Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 : E–F, 18: K, 23: R–S, 30: K, 94: J–L)
Eudocima iridescens is strongly sexually dimorphic with females having a dorsal forewing green transverse band coming to a point at the distal end. It has no hindwing medial patch, separating it from E. homaena but not from all specimens of E. caesar . It can be separated from E. caesar by the hindwing marginal band extending to the inner margin, versus extending slightly beyond vein Cu 2 in E. caesar . Also, E. iridescens has a black tipped orange dorsal abdomen, whereas the dorsal abdomen is orange throughout in E. caesar and E. homaena ( Zilli et al. 2017) . It is known from New Guinea and Queensland, Australia, along with a number of surrounding islands.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |