Convolvulus cneorum var. latifolius Rchb., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv. 18: 83. 1858. (Reichenbach 1858: 83).
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.51.7104 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EC7AFAE5-6D81-5C72-A5F6-5717EC472107 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Convolvulus cneorum var. latifolius Rchb., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv. 18: 83. 1858. (Reichenbach 1858: 83). |
status |
|
Convolvulus cneorum subsp. latifolius (Rchb.) Sa’ad, Meded. Bot. Mus. Herb. Rijks Univ. Utrecht 281: 127. 1967. ( Sa’ad 1967: 127). Type. Based on Convolvulus cneorum var. latifolius Rchb.
Type.
CROATIA, Petter 48 (holotype W).
Distinguishing features.
Distinguished by the oblanceolate leaves.
Distribution.
Much the most common variety: Croatia (Pichler s.n. [4/6/1868], Berger 12/5/1910); Albania (fide Greuter et al. 1983: 4); Italy ( Bornmüller 48, Guadagno s.n. [10/6/1907]); Sicily (Prior s.n. [4/1845], Gabriel s.n. [19/4/1874], Bieringer 99); Tunisia (fide Pottier-Alapette 1981: 716).
Notes.
Var. latifolius is not separated from var. cneorum geographically and does not merit the subspecific status given it by Sa’ad (1967: 127).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Convolvulus cneorum var. latifolius Rchb., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv. 18: 83. 1858. (Reichenbach 1858: 83).
Wood, John R. I., Williams, Bethany R. M., Mitchell, Thomas C., Carine, Mark A., Harris, David J. & Scotland, Robert W. 2015 |
Convolvulus cneorum subsp. latifolius
Rchb., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv. 18: 83. 1858. (Reichenbach 1858 |
Convolvulus cneorum var. latifolius
Rchb., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv. 18: 83. 1858. (Reichenbach 1858 |