Hoggicosa castanea Langlands & Framenau, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00545.x |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EC1F510B-FF9A-6235-FF6F-101EFA49AE26 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hoggicosa castanea |
status |
comb. nov. |
HOGGICOSA CASTANEA ( HOGG, 1905) View in CoL COMB. NOV.
( FIGS 1I View Figure 1 , 3A, B View Figure 3 , 4A–C View Figure 4 , 5A, B View Figure 5 , 7A View Figure 7 , 8A–D View Figure 8 , 9A, B View Figure 9 , 10)
Lycosa castanea Hogg, 1905: 577–579 , fig. 83A–B; Rainbow, 1911: 266; Bonnet, 1957: 2637; McKay, 1973: 396, fig. 3J; McKay, 1985: 75; Platnick, 1993: 487.
Lycosa errans Hogg, 1905: 579 , fig. 84; Rainbow, 1911: 267; Roewer, 1955: 247; Bonnet, 1957: 2640; McKay, 1973: 379, 394–395, fig. 3I. syn. nov.
Lycosa skeeti Pulleine, 1922: 83 , pl. 5, fig. 1; Bonnet, 1957: 2664; McKay, 1973: 397–398, fig. 3K–L. syn. nov.
Lycosa perinflata Pulleine, 1922: 84 , pl. 5, fig. 2; Bonnet, 1957: 2657; McKay, 1973: 395, fig. 3F–H. syn. nov.
Allocosa castanea Roewer, 1955: 206 .
Types: Holotypes. Hoggicosa castanea View in CoL , ♀ from Australia: no locality given, no date ( SAM NN015 View Materials ) . L. errans , ♀ from Australia: no locality given [ Hogg, 1905: ‘(without locality) sent from Adelaide’], no date ( SAM NN016 View Materials ) . L. skeeti , ♀ from South Australia: Wilson, Flinders Ranges , 31°60′S, 138°21′E, iv.1908 ( SAM NN019 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; L. perinflata , ♀ from South Australia: Whyte Yarcowie , 33°13′S, 138°53′E, i.1908 ( SAM NN017 View Materials ) GoogleMaps .
Other material examined: 179 males, 134 females, and five juveniles from 232 records (Appendix S1).
Diagnosis: Hoggicosa castanea is most similar to H. brennani and H. forresti . The subterminal apophysis of H. castanea is very small and reduced ( Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ), whereas it is much longer in H. brennani and H. forresti ( Figs 7C View Figure 7 , 15B View Figure 15 ). The pars pendula in H. castanea is opaque and joins at the embolus tip ( Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ), whereas in H. brennani and H. forresti it is transparent and joins below the embolus tip ( Figs 7C View Figure 7 , 15B View Figure 15 ). Hoggicosa forresti may be distinguished by the presence of a black stripe on the dorsal abdomen, which is absent in both H. castanea and H. brennani . The venter of H. castanea , which is black ( Fig. 4B View Figure 4 ), may also be used to distinguish it from H. brennani , in which it is pale with dark patches ( Fig. 4E View Figure 4 ).
Description: Male: Based on SAM NN19314, Gluepot Station, Gluepot Homestead, 33°44′51′S, 140°01′07′E, South Australia ( SA). Dorsal shield of prosoma brown, with faint radial pattern, covered with black setae. Sternum and labium brown with scattered black setae. Chelicerae dark brown with white setae. Legs brown, but ventral side of femur paler. Opisthosoma dorsally greyish-black, with mottled pale and brown patches. Grey median longitudinal band in anterior
SAM |
South African Museum |
SA |
Museum national d'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratiore de Paleontologie |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hoggicosa castanea
Langlands, Peter R. & Framenau, Volker W. 2010 |
Allocosa castanea
Roewer CF 1955: 206 |
Lycosa skeeti
McKay RJ 1973: 397 |
Bonnet P 1957: 2664 |
Pulleine RH 1922: 83 |
Lycosa perinflata
McKay RJ 1973: 395 |
Bonnet P 1957: 2657 |
Pulleine RH 1922: 84 |
Lycosa castanea
Platnick NI 1993: 487 |
McKay RJ 1985: 75 |
McKay RJ 1973: 396 |
Bonnet P 1957: 2637 |
Rainbow WJ 1911: 266 |
Hogg HR 1905: 579 |
Lycosa errans
McKay RJ 1973: 379 |
Bonnet P 1957: 2640 |
Roewer CF 1955: 247 |
Rainbow WJ 1911: 267 |
Hogg HR 1905: 579 |