Eupsophus
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.863.35484 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FA0BFCAE-31D1-4DAC-BD05-20A3FC182E61 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EB7DCE72-B48C-3BB7-E36D-FF88E16CB534 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Eupsophus |
status |
spp. |
Eupsophus spp. Fig. 3A View Figure 3
Geographic distribution.
The two undescribed species mentioned in the recent literature ( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ) are known from one locality each: Tolhuaca ( Eupsophus sp. 2 of Blotto et al. 2013) and Villarrica ( Eupsophus sp. of Suárez-Villota et al. 2018b) (both considered as E. roseus by Correa et al. 2017). Also, a series of populations located between 36°10' and 38°15'S, assigned to E. roseus by Correa et al. (2017), should be included here since they occupy intermediate phylogenetic and geographic positions among the species recognized by Suárez-Villota et al. (2018b). Almost all these localities are within the latitudinal limits defined for E. roseus according to historical records (see above), but as Correa et al. (2017) indicated, these populations cannot identify unambiguously to species level by their external characters. Other southernmost undetermined populations included in Correa et al. (2017) (Santa Amelia, Pumalal, Puringue and Malalhue) are considered here as E. roseus because they make up a well-supported monophyletic group with specimens from the type locality of that species (where the specimen from Naguilán is also included). The two new localities where phenotypic observations were done for this review (see below) are also included here.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.