Orius (Dimorphella), Reuter, 1884
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2015.1104393 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4332783 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EA370637-2078-0D01-41C0-372FFC87FA26 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Orius (Dimorphella) |
status |
|
Subgenus Dimorphella Reuter, 1884
Dimorphella Reuter, 1884: 646 (subgenus of Triphleps ). Type species by monotypy: Anthocoris agilis Flor, 1860 ; Wagner 1952: 25 (subgenus of Orius View in CoL , redescription); Ghauri 1972: 414 (subgenus of Orius View in CoL , list); Péricart 1972: 185 (subgenus of Orius View in CoL , diagnosis, key); Elov 1976: 374 (subgenus of Orius View in CoL , key); Kerzhner 1988: 775 (subgenus of Orius View in CoL , key); Ghahari et al. 2009: 50 (subgenus of Orius View in CoL , list); Aukema et al. 2013: 90 (catalogue).
Paraorius Yasunaga and Miyamoto, 1993: 230 (subgenus of Orius View in CoL ). Type species by monotypy: Anthocoris tantillus Motschulsky, 1863 ; Péricart 1996: 127 (catalogue); Yasunaga 1997c: 387 (diagnosis, discussion); Aukema et al. 2013: 92 (catalogue). Syn. nov.
Diagnosis
Recognised by the combination of following characters: head and pronotum finely and densely covered with setigerous punctures; head without a longer erect seta on each side of clypeus, near anteromedial margin of each eye, and between eye and ocellus; pronotum lacking long stout seta on each angle, with callus flattened and centrally separated by setigerous punctures; male profemora sometimes with 3 – 5 small teeth on ventral side; paramere usually with cone apically obtuse, lacking denticule. Detailed diagnostic characters were provided by Péricart (1967, 1972).
Remarks
Yasunaga and Miyamoto (1993) established the subgenus Paraorius to accommodate O. tantillus ( Motschulsky, 1863) following the opinion of Ghauri (1972) and Woodward and Postle (1986). Hernández and Stonedahl (1999) did not agree with the placement of O. tantillus in an independent subgenus because this species shares many characters with species of Dimorphella . They treated it as a member of the subgenus Dimorphella . Subsequently, Yasunaga (2001) followed the treatment of Hernández and Stonedahl (1999) without taxonomic comment. However, Paraorius is yet to be published as a synonym of Dimorphella . We also agree with the placement of O. tantillus in Dimorphella and herein suggest Paraorius is a junior synonym of Dimorphella .
Dimorphella currently comprises nine species (cf. Péricart 1996; Yasunaga 1997c; Hernández and Stonedahl 1999; Aukema et al. 2013). In Southeast Asia, only two species are known, O. maxidentex and O. tantillus ; both were also previously recorded from Thailand ( Yasunaga and Miyamoto 1993; Kernasa et al. 2008).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Orius (Dimorphella)
Yamada, Kazutaka, Yasunaga, Tomohide & Artchawakom, Taksin 2015 |
Paraorius
Aukema B & Rabitsch W & Rieger CH 2013: 92 |
Yasunaga T 1997: 387 |
Pericart J 1996: 127 |
Yasunaga T & Miyamoto S 1993: 230 |
Dimorphella
Aukema B & Rabitsch W & Rieger CH 2013: 90 |
Ghahari H & Carpintero DL & Ostovan H 2009: 50 |
Kerzhner IM 1988: 775 |
Elov EC 1976: 374 |
Ghauri MSK 1972: 414 |
Pericart J 1972: 185 |
Wagner E 1952: 25 |
Reuter OM 1884: 646 |