Upeneus vittatus, Forsskal, 1775 (Forsskal, 1775)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.56042/ijms.v51i09.2332 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11656380 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E803510B-FFFC-FFD3-FCA6-FC700CF350DC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Upeneus vittatus |
status |
|
In this study, a total of 237 samples were collected randomly from three landing centers. The results of the descriptive statistics are given in Table 1 View Table 1 . The findings revealed that the left and right otoliths of U. vittatus are not significantly different in size from one another. For the Mumbai population, the total length, otolith length, otolith width and otolith weight ranged between 10.45 – 21.44 cm, 0.314 – 0.5962 cm, 0.112 – 0.398 cm and 0.0029 – 0.0089 gm, respectively ( Table 1 View Table 1 ). For the Kakinada population, the total length, otolith length, otolith width, and otolith weight were ranged between 11.67 – 17.52 cm, 0.334 – 0.487 cm, 0.212 – 0.304 cm, and 0.0031 – 0.0075 gm, respectively ( Table 1 View Table 1 ). Similarly, for Puri population the total length, otolith length, otolith width and otolith weight were ranged between 11.87 – 16.59 cm, 0.327 – 0.409 cm, 0.208 – 0.272 cm and 0.002 – 0.0099 gm, respectively ( Table 1 View Table 1 ). Puri population had the highest correlation between fish length and otolith weight (R 2 = 0.9101), followed by Kakinada and Mumbai populations ( Fig. 4a, d, g View Fig ). The GoogleMaps maximum correlation between fish length and otolith width was observed in the Kakinada GoogleMaps population (R 2 = 0.8957), followed by Odisha and Mumbai populations ( Fig. 4b, e, h View Fig ). The GoogleMaps maximum correlation between fish length and otolith length was observed in the Mumbai population (R 2 = 0.9306), followed by Odisha and Kakinada GoogleMaps populations ( Fig. 4c, f, i View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.