Lachesilla drucei, García Aldrete, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4347.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:320F6118-B0F3-4D9A-BA05-D1A4A591C43E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6009013 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E73E0B31-5512-FFD6-FF15-F9366817FE22 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lachesilla drucei |
status |
sp. nov. |
Lachesilla drucei View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs 21–26 View FIGURES 21 – 26 )
Diagnosis. Hypandrium broad, subquadrate, with a setal field on each side, posterior processes in the middle, slender, elongate, distally acuminate. Phallosome V-shaped anteriorly, arms slender, elongate, distally dilated, ending in two pointed apophyses. Subgenital plate projected posteriorly, projection straight distally, obtusely convex anteriorly. Gonapophyses long, narrowing distally, with a small apical projection. Ninth sternum elliptic, with a pigmented band anteriorly, concave posteriorly in the middle.
Description. Male. Color (10 years in 80% ethanol). Body tawny brown. Compound eyes black, ocelli hyaline, with ochre centripetal crescents. Tergal lobes of meso- and metathorax more pigmented. Abdomen whitish, with pale brown subcuticular rings, faded ventrally.
Morphology. As in diagnosis plus the following: Pterostigma narrow anteriorly, rounded, wide distally. Rs-M meeting at a point, areola postica broadly triangular, rounded apically ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 21 – 26 ). Hypandrium and phallosome ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 21 – 26 ). Paraprocts ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 21 – 26 ) rounded, with a macrosetae near sensory fields, other setae as illustrated; a sclerotized band anteriorly, limiting sensory fields, the sensory fields with 11 trichobothria. Mesal prong stout, curved, distally truncate. Epiproct ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 21 – 26 ) wide, anteriorly straight, posteriorly bilobed, with a setal field on each lobe, a mesal protuberance on each side of longitudinal midline.
Measurements. FW: 1810, HW: 1424, F: 360, T: 694, t1: 206, t2: 96, ctt1: 12, Mx4: 91, f1: 288, f2: 233, IO: 309, D: 149, d: 100, IO/d: 3.09, PO: 0.67.
Female. Color (10 years in 80% ethanol). Same as in the male.
Morphology. As in diagnosis plus the following: Wings as in the male. Subgenital plate wide, setae as illustrated ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 21 – 26 ). Gonapophyses ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 21 – 26 ). Ninth sternum ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 21 – 26 ) with a narrow pigmented band along posterior border, and a broad pigmented band anteriorly, as in diagnosis; spermapore centrally located, with a pigmented rim. Paraprocts ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 21 – 26 ) broadly elliptic, setae as illustrated, sensory fields with 9–10 trichobothria. Epiproct ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 21 – 26 ) trapeziform, slightly concave anteriorly, setae as illustrated.
Measurements. FW: 1912, HW: 1484, F: 495, T: 702, t1: 217, t2: 106, ctt1: 15, Mx4: 106, IO: 347, D: 187, d: 90, IO/d: 3.85, PO: 0.48.
Specimens studied. Holotype male. MEXICO . Chiapas. Pueblo Nuevo. Soluchistán. Rincón Chamula, 1760 m. 17º11’40”N : 92º55’27” W. 26.vi.2007. L. Cervantes, C. Mayorga & G. Ortega. Paratypes: 2 males, 4 females, same data as the holotype GoogleMaps .
Etymology. This species honors the memory of Herbert Druce, author of the Insecta. Lepidoptera. Heterocera. Volume I (1881–1900), Volume II (1891–1900) and Volume III (1881–1900), of the Biologia Centrali-Americana.
Remarks. This is one of three species in the group, in which the subgenital plate is projected posteriorly in the middle, instead of having a mesal flap; the other species are L. zuninoi García Aldrete , and L. zuninoides García Aldrete , from the Mexican states of Hidalgo and Veracruz, and from Guerrero, Hidalgo and Oaxaca, respectively. L. drucei clearly differs from them in the projection of the subgenital plate, and in the gonapophyses and ninth sternum (see García Aldrete, 2014). For characters of the male see diagnosis above.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |