Docalidia cornipes, Nielson, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2952.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5286334 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E70787A4-FF96-E179-FF5D-E4AFCC7D8A05 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Docalidia cornipes |
status |
sp. nov. |
Docalidia cornipes View in CoL , sp. nov.
(Plate IIB, Figs. 74–82 View FIGURES 74–82 )
Length. Male 8.80 mm., female unknown.
External morphology. Large, robust species. General color of dorsum brown to black (damaged); forewings nearly unicolorous brown, suffused black on clavus; mesonotum black; pronotum brown with suffused black markings anteriorly; crown yellow with dark brown markings on disk; eyes translucent; face black (Plate IIB); clypeus with small yellow spots, anterior margin yellow; clypellus with median, longitudinal yellow stripe.
Head broad, narrower than pronotum, anterior margin broadly rounded; crown broad, as wide as eye, produced distally about ¼ of entire length, disk foveate on each side of middle; pronotum as long as crown, surface bullated; mesonotum nearly twice as long as pronotum; forewings long, broad, venation typical; clypeus long, broad, lateral margins broadly convex; median longitudinal carina prominent; clypellus about 1/3 as long as clypeus, narrow with broad, medial longitudinal ridge, lateral margins convex.
PLATE II. A–H. Dorsal habitus. A. Docalidia cornicula , sp. nov.; B. Docalidia cornipes , sp. nov.; C. Docalidia curvatura , sp. nov.; D. Docalidia deitzi , sp. nov.; E. Docalidia dennisi , sp. nov.; F. Docalidia dietrichi , sp. nov.; G. Docalidia dmitrievi , sp. nov.; H. Docalidia exilitis , sp. nov.
Male genitalia. Pygofer in lateral view with long, robust caudodorsal lobelike process, caudoventral process absent ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 74–82 ); segment X moderately long, with long lobelike ventral process ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 74–82 ); right subgenital plate long, very broad, glabrous, with membranous outer lateral margin ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 74–82 ); right style about as long as aedeagus with setaceous flange near middle, robust apical spine and very long, membraneous, flangelike apical process ( Fig. 77, 78 View FIGURES 74–82 ); aedeagus in lateral view, sinuate, shaft broad in basal half, striate, small, pointed projection below medial process on lateral margin, medial process arising laterally, projecting basally ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 74–82 ), in dorsal view, preatrium very large, triangulate, shaft broad below, constrict below medial process, dentate subapically ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 74–82 ); connective T-shaped, stem Y-shaped, paired medial ridge extending distally beyond anterior arms ( Fig. 81 View FIGURES 74–82 ); dorsal connective plate like, base broad ( Fig. 82 View FIGURES 74–82 ).
Material examined. Holotype male. COLOMBIA: Amazonas , PNN., Amacayacu, Cabaña Lorena, 3º0’S 69º59’ W., 210 m., 27 Aug 01–1 Sep 01, M.2237, Malaise, D. Campos (HB). GoogleMaps
Etymology. The name is descriptive for the horned foot shaped base of the aedeagus in dorsal view.
Remarks. From D. cornicula , n. sp. to which it has some similar male genitalia features, D. cornipe s can be separated by the large, horn shaped base of the aedeagus in dorsal view, by the very long apical flange on the style and by the lobelike caudodorsal process of the pygofer.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |