Novalena Chamberlin & Ivie 1942
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.571683 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:894795FB-ED38-4132-92B9-6AC8C3E41566 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6031524 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E45787C5-FF85-FFFD-E1A1-646DFC55FEF5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Novalena Chamberlin & Ivie 1942 |
status |
|
Genus Novalena Chamberlin & Ivie 1942 View in CoL View at ENA
Type species. Novalena intermedia (Chamberlin & Gertsch 1930) by original designation ( Chamberlin & Ivie 1942).
Composition. Fifty-three species: N. annamae (Gertsch & Davis 1940) , N. approximata (Gertsch & Ivie 1936) , N. attenuata (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge 1902) , N. bipartita (Kraus 1955) , N. bipunctata Roth 1967 stat. rev., N. calavera Chamberlin & Ivie 1942 , N. costata (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge 1902) , N. intermedia (Chamberlin & Gertsch 1930) , N. laticava (Kraus 1955) , N. lutzi (Gertsch 1933) , N. orizaba (Banks 1898) , N. shlomitae (García- Villafuerte 2009), N. simplex (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge 1902) , N. ajusco sp. nov., N. alamo sp. nov., N. alvarezi sp. nov., N. atzimbo sp. nov., N. bosencheve sp. nov., N. chamberlini sp. nov., N. cieneguilla sp. nov., N. cintalapa sp. nov., N. clara sp. nov., N. comaltepec sp. nov., N. creel sp. nov., N. dentata sp. nov., N. divisadero sp. nov., N. durango sp. nov., N. franckei sp. nov., N. garnica sp. nov., N. gibarrai sp. nov., N. irazu sp. nov., N. iviei sp. nov., N. ixtlan sp. nov., N. jiquilpan sp. nov., N. leonensis sp. nov., N. mexiquensis sp. nov., N. oaxaca sp. nov., N.
paricutin sp. nov., N. perote sp. nov., N. plata sp. nov., N. poncei sp. nov., N. popoca sp. nov., N. prieta sp. nov., N. puebla sp. nov., N. punta sp. nov., N. rothi sp. nov., N. saltoensis sp. nov., N. sinaloa sp. nov., N. tacana sp. nov., N. triunfo sp. nov., N. valdezi sp. nov., N. victoria sp. nov., and N. volcanes sp. nov.
Diagnosis. The genus is diagnosed by the following characteristics in combination: the male pedipalp with a short and simple curved embolus ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 b, 13a, 18a, 32a, 43d); conductor with two projections ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 c, 10a, 14c, 27a, 41f); tegular median process present ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 a, 13a, 26a, 34d, 38a); RTA with distal and dorsal projections, ventral projection usually present ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 d, 11b, 16m, 30e, 33e) (absent in N. shlomitae , N. simplex , N. chamberlini , N. cintalapa , N. gibarrai , N. oaxaca , and N. tacana , Figs. 15 View FIGURE 15 b, 18b, 32b); atrium posteriorly located on the epigynal plate, wider than long ( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 a, 13c, 19c, 24d, 40a), and usually lacking a division (if divided [ N. calavera and N. lutzi ] then copulatory openings visible in posterior view, Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 e, 12e); atrial spurs usually present ( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 d, 15c, 24a, 33a, 42c) (absent in N. calavera , N. lutzi , and N. garnica , Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 c, 12c, 26c); short and strongly sclerotized copulatory ducts, straight or curved ( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 b, 14d, 20b, 36a, 38d), connected ectally to longer than wide primary spermathecae ( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 e, 10b, 15d, 25d, 31d); secondary spermathecae blind-ended receptacles with primary pores and each connected to the union of copulatory duct and primary spermathecae by short diverticulum ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 f, 14f, 30g, 36b, 44e); and short fertilization ducts ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 d, 13d, 22d, 31d, 39d).
Novalena View in CoL differs from Eratigena Bolzern et al. 2013 View in CoL and Tegenaria Latreille 1804 View in CoL in having strongly procurved eye rows in frontal view; from Agelenopsis Giebel 1869 View in CoL , Barronopsis Chamberlin & Ivie 1941 View in CoL , Melpomene View in CoL , and Tortolena Chamberlin & Ivie 1941 View in CoL in lacking both a strongly modified embolus and projecting tegular lateral process in males (= tegular apophysis, Stocks 2009: fig. 39), and lacking long, membranous and plicate copulatory ducts in females (as in Stocks 2009: figs. 52, 61); from Calilena Chamberlin & Ivie 1941 View in CoL in lacking a membranous fulcrum (as in Chamberlin & Ivie 1941: figs. 68, 70, 74) (only present in N. annamae ) and an epigynal scape (as in Chamberlin & Ivie 1941: figs. 48–60); from Hololena (Chamberlin & Gertsch 1929) View in CoL in lacking a fulcrum supporting the embolus (as in Chamberlin & Ivie 1942: figs. 6, 11, 12) and an anteriorly located epigynal atrium (as in Chamberlin & Ivie 1942: fig. 10); from Rothilena Maya-Morales & Jiménez 2013 View in CoL in lacking three projections on conductor (as in Maya-Morales & Jiménez 2013: fig. 18) and spherical primary spermathecae (as in Maya-Morales & Jiménez 2013: fig. 29); from Rualena View in CoL in lacking a membranous fulcrum (as in Maya- Morales & Jiménez 2016: fig. 43) and an atrium as long as wide (as in Maya-Morales & Jiménez 2016: fig. 30); and from Hoffmannilena View in CoL in lacking a basal projection on RTA (as in Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 b, c) and a strongly sclerotized epigynal plate (as in Maya-Morales & Jiménez 2016: fig. 116).
Description. Medium-sized spiders, 4–14 mm total length. Eight eyes in two rows strongly procurved in frontal view ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 b). Carapace with two symmetrical longitudinal dark bands intensified by feathery scales and a black band around the border of thoracic region ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 c, i, r). Chelicerae with three promarginal teeth and two to four retromarginal teeth ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 c). Sternum longer than wide ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 f). Feathery scales present on carapace, opisthosoma, pedipalps, and legs ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 a, b). Opisthosoma oval with dorsal foliate pattern and/or posterior chevrons ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 b, k, s). Colulus divided with few hairs on each side ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 c). PLS longest with distal segment 0.5– 1.25 times basal ( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 f, 9a). Legs formula usually 4123. Legs usually annulated ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 b–d, k). Patella I and II with two dorsal spines and one prolateral spine, patella III and VI with two dorsal spines, one prolateral spine, and one retrolateral spine. Leg tarsi with five to eight trichobothria. Capsulate tarsal organ distad of trichobothrial row ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 f). Pedipalp femur with two to four dorsal spines. Female pedipalp tibia usually with one + two prolateral spines. Male pedipalp tibia with two to four spines and with prolateroventral protuberance and retrolateroventral groove ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 e). RTA of male pedipalp with distal and dorsal projections; ventral projection usually present ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 d). Embolus a short and simple curve ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 a). Conductor with two short projections ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 c). Median apophysis spoon-shaped ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 a) (only reduced in N. alamo , Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 d). Tegular median process present ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 b). Fulcrum absent (only present in N. annamae , Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 a). Female epigynal plate wider than long ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 c). Atrium on posterior part of plate, usually wider than long ( Fig. 30 View FIGURE 30 f). Atrial spurs usually present ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 a) (absent in N. calavera , N. lutzi , and N. garnica ). Internal genitalia with copulatory ducts strongly sclerotized, straight ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 a) or curved ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 d). Spermathecae bipartite ( Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 ); primary spermathecae longer than wide ( Fig. 32 View FIGURE 32 d), secondary spermathecae blind-ended receptacles with primary pores ( Bennett 1992) and each connected to the union of copulatory duct and primary spermathecae by short diverticulum ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 b). Fertilization ducts short, originating from the posterior part of spermathecae ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 d).
Habitat. In North America, Novalena spiders are usually found in webs under loose bark of standing trees and stumps in dense coniferous forest, and occasionally in webs on the ground in shaded areas ( Roth & Brame 1972).
In tropical montane cloud forests of southeastern Mexico, they are found in webs within epiphytes and on understory vegetation and the ground.
Distribution. Novalena is widely distributed in the western Nearctic and northern Neotropics from southwestern Canada to Costa Rica and Trinidad and Tobago (Maps 1–8).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Novalena Chamberlin & Ivie 1942
Maya-Morales, Julieta & Jiménez, María Luisa 2017 |
Eratigena
Bolzern et al. 2013 |
Rothilena Maya-Morales & Jiménez 2013
Maya-Morales & Jimenez 2013 |
Barronopsis
Chamberlin & Ivie 1941 |
Tortolena
Chamberlin & Ivie 1941 |
Calilena
Chamberlin & Ivie 1941 |
Hololena
Chamberlin & Gertsch 1929 |
Agelenopsis
Giebel 1869 |
Tegenaria
Latreille 1804 |