Milnesium Doyère, 1840
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.822.1807 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:522FD009-B4C9-4A80-871E-883E2EBE09C8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6620673 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E27887D6-CA4D-FFD1-FF25-FC2AFB48FE03 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Milnesium Doyère, 1840 |
status |
|
Dichotomous key of the species of Milnesium Doyère, 1840 View in CoL from South America
1. Dorsal cuticle smooth ....................................................................................................................... 2
– Dorsal cuticle ornamented (pseudopores-reticulum-dimples) .......................................................... 5
2. Claw configuration [2-2]-[2-2] .......................................................... M. kogui Londoño et al., 2015 View in CoL
– Claw configuration [3-3]-[3-3] ......................................................................................................... 3
3. BT funnel-shaped in adults (posterior/anterior width ratio lower than 65%) ..................................... .............................................. M. eurystomum Maucci, 1991 View in CoL (amended by Michalczyk et al. 2012b; amended by Morek et al. 2020a)
– BT about cylindrical in adults (posterior/anterior width ratio higher than 75%) ............................. 4
4. Pt of BT standard width lower than 52 in adults .................. M. brachyungue Binda & Pilato, 1990 View in CoL
– Pt of BT standard width higher than 52 in adults .............................................. M. quiranae View in CoL sp. nov.
5. Claw configuration [3-3]-[3-3] ......................................................................................................... 6
– Claw configuration different ............................................................................................................. 7
6. Nine rows of pseudoplates, pt of SS [63.8–66.7]; pt of BT standard width [58.1–65.6] ................... ..................................................................................................... M. beatae Roszkowska et al., 2015 View in CoL
– Without pseudoplates, pt of SS [70.0–73.7], pt of BT standard width [24.2–32.3] ........................... ............................................................................................ M. argentinum Roszkowska et al., 2015 View in CoL
7. Claw configuration [2-2]-[2-2] .............................................. M. katarzynae Kaczmarek et al., 2004 View in CoL
– Claw configuration different ............................................................................................................. 8
8. Claw configuration [2-3]-[2-2], pt of BT standard width [46.1–56.9], with 9 rows of pseudoplates ... ................................................................................................................................... M. irenae View in CoL sp. nov.
– Claw configuration [2-3]-[3-2] .............................................................................................................9
9. Cuticular dimples arranged in 10 bands, small tubercles around all claw bases, pt of BT standard width [55.2–64.0], young specimens with claw configuration [2-2]-[2-2] .... M. pelufforum View in CoL sp. nov.
– Cuticular dimples present not forming bands, pt of BT standard width [33.0–38.0], no tubercles around claw bases ..................................................... M. krzysztofi Kaczmarek & Michalczyk, 2007
Abbreviations: BT = buccal tube; SS = stylet support insertion point on the buccal tube.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |