Phaenoglyphis Förster, 1869
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/BDJ.12.e120950 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13820762 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E1325346-1CAB-5222-972B-D6318DCE0332 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Phaenoglyphis Förster, 1869 |
status |
|
Diagnosis
Morphological diagnosis
Like in Alloxysta , the metasomal tergites are not fused in Phaenoglyphis . It is the only genus which has a mesopleural sulcus, which differentiates it from Alloxysta and other charipine genera. The presence of notauli and the presence and shape of the scutellar foveae are also unique for many Phaenoglyphis species within the charipines (though both notauli and scutellar foveae are absent in some Phaenoglyphis species).
Molecular diagnosis
A 6 bp deletion is characteristic for the genus Phaenoglyphis . It is unique within Figitidae and shared with Ibalia Latreille, 1802 (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ). The two-amino-acid deletion of Phaenoglyphis and Ibalia is located at the same position as the deletion of a Pompilidae species reported by Park et al. (2010) and of all Eurytomidae reported recently by Jafari et al. (2023). The gap is roughly at bp-position 476 et seqq., though its exact location is difficult to conclude upon as the site is overall very variable. It might be that the gap is, in fact, not homologous with the gap in Pompilidae and Eurytomidae . In other closely-related taxa ( Alloxysta , Apocharips and Dilyta ), the six here present base pairs code for arguably random amino acids (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |