Nerocila recurvispina Schiöedte & Meinert, 1881
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4622.1.1 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4537BB46-452F-4E0C-A444-4AA5E12A64E7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5698831 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E129637E-FFA0-A479-FF47-FB9FFE19F870 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nerocila recurvispina Schiöedte & Meinert, 1881 |
status |
|
Nerocila recurvispina Schiöedte & Meinert, 1881 View in CoL
Nerocila recurvispina Schiöedte & Meinert, 1881: 24–25 View in CoL , tab. I, figs 8, 9 View FIGURE 9 . — Nierstrasz, 1931: 125. — Bruce, 1987a: 406. — Trilles, 1994: 99. — Aneesh, Valarmathi & Mitra, 2017d: 1–13, figs 1–9 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 .¨¨
Type and type locality. The holotype (15 mm) held at the Zoological Museum of Berlin ( ZMB 3389) coll. by Schiöedte & Meinert from Hooghly River, Kolkata, India.
Remarks. Nerocila recurvispina can be easily differentiated from other species of the genus Nerocila by the following characters: coxae 2–7 partially visible in dorsal view, produced into narrow, pointed and recurved processes directed backwards; coxae gradually increasing the size from 2–7 and reaches up to or just behind the corresponding segment; postero-lateral angles of all pereonites produced into narrow, apically pointed, acute and upwardly directed recurved spines; increasing the length of the recurved spines progressively from pereonites 1–7; ventro-lateral margins of pleonites 1 and 2 posteriorly directed, narrow and acute, extending up to pleonite 4 and beyond pleonite 5, respectively; pleonites 3–5 slightly produced; postero-lateral angles of pleonites 1 and 2 produced into narrow, apically pointed, acute and upwardly directed recurved spines; lateral margins of pleonites 3–5 faintly acute; pleotelson 1.2 times as wide as long.
The distribution of N. recurvispina is restricted to India; it was collected only from the Hooghly River, Kolkata, India, by Schiöedte & Meinert (1881) and J. Wood-Mason ( Aneesh et al. 2017d). The host fish of this species is still unknown. Recently, Aneesh et al. (2017d) provide the redescription of N. recurvispina , considering the description of its life-cycle stages (male, female, transitional and juvenile), provides key information on its parasitic and protandric hermaphroditic life, as well as important cues for the precise identification from type locality.
Distribution. Reported only from Hooghly River, Kolkata, India (type locality) ( Schiöedte & Meinert, 1881; Aneesh et al. 2017d).
Host. Unknown.
ZMB |
Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (Zoological Collections) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Nerocila recurvispina Schiöedte & Meinert, 1881
Ravichandran, S., Vigneshwaran, P. & Rameshkumar, G. 2019 |
Nerocila recurvispina Schiöedte & Meinert, 1881: 24–25
Trilles, J. - P. 1994: 99 |
Bruce, N. L. 1987: 406 |
Nierstrasz, H. F. 1931: 125 |