Agrion puella, (Linnaeus, 1758) (Linnaeus, 1758) " (Skvortsov & Snegovaya, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5471.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BAA047F4-2D65-4E52-8798-D426E3B26DA1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12206857 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DB0F87E1-9132-F13D-A7D3-FBA17FF97BFB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Agrion puella |
status |
|
Key to the species of puella -group in a broad sense
The following simple key may be proposed for the representatives of the puella -group in a broad sense in the Caucasus.
1. Males.............................................................................................. 2
- Females............................................................................................ 5
2. Paraproct spine directed caudad and as long as 5/6 of S10 length in lateral view; pronotum hind lobe almost straight, with scarcely traced lateral depressions and a central notch........................................ C. australocaspicum View in CoL
- Paraproct spine more or less slanting as to some extent inclining up, not longer than 2/3 of S10 length in lateral view; pronotum hind lobe more or less trilobate.......................................................................... 3
3. Depression between paraproct spine and prominence scarcely expressed, not deeper than rounded rectangular; spine thick; cercus trunk in lateral view slanting as a curve, without expressed apex.................................... C. puella
- Depression between paraproct spine and prominence deep, prominence process-like; cercus trunk in lateral view has an expressed apex....................................................................................... 4
4. Paraproct spine directed more up than behind, so that incision between it and prominence broad; cercus trunk in dorsal view of almost even width.......................................................................... C. pulchellum View in CoL
- Paraproct spine directed more behind than up, so that incision between it and prominence narrower; cercus trunk in dorsal view broadening................................................................................. C. ponticum View in CoL
5. Pronotum hind lobe almost straight, with a negligible central notch............................. C. australocaspicum View in CoL
- Pronotum hind lobe more or less trilobate................................................................. 6
6. Pronotum hind lobe with three strong lobes and deep depressions between them........................ C. pulchellum View in CoL
- Pronotum hind lobe with smooth lobes and depressions between them........................................... 7
7. Pronotum hind lobe with very smooth lobes of about the same size, with symmetrical shallow depressions between them, S8 black optionally with small blue markings........................................................... C. puella
- Pronotum hind lobe with better expressed lobes, with the central one larger, and asymmetrical incisions between them; S8 largerly blue................................................................................ C. ponticum View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |