Caribicus, Schools & Hedges, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4974.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0CCA430E-5601-42CB-847F-87B22BFD3112 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4891070 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DA66BA10-FFCF-FFEA-0DF1-0DC1049BD28E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Caribicus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Genus Caribicus gen. nov.
Northern Hispaniola Forest Lizards
Figs. 8–9 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9
Type species. Celestus darlingtoni Cochran, 1939:2 .
Diagnosis. Species of Caribicus have (1) claw sheath, absent, (2) contact between the nasal and rostral scales, absent, (3) scales in contact with the nasal scale, four, (4) postnasal scales, one, (5) position of the nostril in the nasal scale, central, (6) keels on dorsal body scales, present, (7) digits per limb, five, (8) longest toe lamellae, 12–19, (9) dorsal scale rows, 80–233, (10) relative head width, 13.6–17.2, (11) relative rostral height, 39.7–58.3, (12) relative frontonasal length, 2.98–3.32, (13) relative interparietal distance, 0.468–1.42, (14) relative axilla-groin distance, 67.1–69.1.
From Advenus gen. nov., we distinguish Caribicus gen. nov. by the claw sheath (absent versus its presence in Advenus gen. nov.), keels on the dorsal scales (present versus their absence i n Advenu s gen. nov.) ), relative head width (13.6–17.2 versus 12.0), relative frontonasal length (2.98–3.32 versus 2.46), and the relative axilla-groin distance (67.1–69.1 versus 60.0). From Celestus , we distinguish Caribicus gen. nov. by the relative axilla-groin distance (67.1–69.1 versus 60.9–66.4). From Comptus gen. nov., we distinguish Caribicus gen. nov. by the relative interparietal distance(0.468–1.42 versus0–0.435), and the relative axilla-groin distance(67.1–69.1 versus51.9–60.0). From Panolopus , we distinguish Caribicus gen. nov. by keels on the dorsal body scales (present versus their absence in Panolopus ), relative frontonasal length (2.98–3.32 versus 1.93–2.94), and the relative axilla-groin distance (67.1– 69.1 versus 49.7–59.6). From Sauresia , we distinguish Caribicus gen. nov. by the claw sheath (absent versus its presence in Sauresia ), keels on the dorsal body scales (present versus their absence in Sauresia ), digits per limb (five versus four), relative head width (13.6–17.2 versus 9.36–12.2), relative frontonasal length (2.98–3.32 versus 1.70– 2.56), and the distance between the parietal scales (0.468–1.42 versus 0–0.431). From Wetmorena , we distinguish Caribicus gen. nov. by the claw sheath (absent versus its presence in Wetmorena ), keels on the dorsal scales (present versus their absence in Wetmorena ), digits per limb (five versus four), and the relative frontonasal length (2.98–3.32 versus 1.47–2.69).
Content. Three species ( Table 3 View TABLE 3 ): Caribicus anelpistus , C. darlingtoni , and C. warreni .
Distribution. Caribicus gen. nov. occurs on the geological North Island of Hispaniola and adjacent Ile de Tortue ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ).
Etymology. The generic name ( Caribicus gen. nov.) is a masculine noun derived from the name for the region (Caribbean) in which it occurs and the suffix - icus (“belonging to”).
Remarks. Caribicus gen. nov. is a monophyletic clade that has a support value of 100% in Bayesian and ML analyses ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Our phylogenies do not include C. anelpistus . That species and C. warreni are both giant (up to 279 mm SVL) whereas C. darlingtoni is much smaller (up to 85 mm SVL) and was never thought to be closely related to the giant species. For many years, the giant species were placed in Diploglossus and the small species was placed in Celestus ( Schwartz & Henderson, 1991) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.