Archaemecys arcantiensis, Saupe & Selden, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/g2009n1a5 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DA308791-A528-A84D-8C91-028DFCA7077B |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Archaemecys arcantiensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Archaemecys arcantiensis n. sp. ( Figs 1-3 View FIG View FIG View FIG )
Arachnida Salticidae – Néraudeau et al. 2002: fig. 6.8.
TYPE LOCALITY. — Archingeay-Les Nouillers, Charente- Maritime, south-west France .
ETYMOLOGY. — The specific epithet is based on Arcantiatum, former Latin name of the locality Archingeay from which the fossil originates.
DIAGNOSIS. — As for the genus.
DESCRIPTION
Body length 3.10. Carapace 1.31 long, 0.94 wide, ≥ 0.66 high; pars cephalica highly elevated so that carapace, when viewed from side, appears subrectangular in outline; without tubercles.Only AME visible on anterior face of carapace. Chelicerae with ≥ 11 peg teeth on promargin ( Fig. 3 View FIG ); peg teeth ≈ 0.17 long, chelicerae 0.71 long; fang ≥ 0.35 long; chelicerae appear to originate from a foramen, although this is not certain; sclerotized lip/projection above where chelicerae originate ( Fig. 3 View FIG ). Sternum 0.34 wide, 0.57 long, lateral margins project slightly between coxae. Maxillae converge slightly, almost circular in shape. Petiole encircled by sclerotized plate ( Fig. 2A View FIG ); rugose epigastric plate, flanked by book lung covers ( Fig. 2B View FIG ). Opisthosoma 1.42 long, approximately 1.10 wide, height uncertain; likely sub-globular in life; dorsal surface not preserved so presence of scutum not known. Opisthosomal cuticle wrinkled in subparallel lines, bearing short, plumose setae, each originating from a prominent follicle.Four spinnerets and anal tubercle surrounded by well-developed chitinous ring ( Fig. 2B View FIG ); ALS well defined in two segments ( Fig. 1D View FIG ), posterior spinnerets smaller; patch of cuticle with short setae in front of ALS, possibly a colulus. Spiracle situated well anterior to spinnerets; well fortified with cuticle ring ( Fig. 1 View FIG A-C).
Leg formula 1423; leg 1 cx 0.23, tr 0.16, fe 0.57, pt 0.25, ti 0.39, mt 0.39, ts 0.39, total 2.38; leg 2 cx 0.18, tr 0.19, fe 0.52, pt 0.20, ti 0.38, mt 0.33, ts 0.33, total 2.13; leg 3 cx 0.17, tr 0.18, fe 0.45, pt 0.21, ti 0.39, mt 0.33, ts 0.28, total 2.01; leg 4 cx 0.25, tr 0.16, fe 0.54, pt 0.20, ti 0.44, mt 0.41, ts 0.33, total 2.33. Plumose setae on all leg segments; no spines; each metatarsus with single trichobothrium, most likely on dorsal surface (trichobothrium located seven-tenths of way along metatarsus from proximal end in legs 2-4); tibiae 2-4 with at least one (up to three) trichobothria ( Fig. 2 View FIG ). Legs relatively short and stout. Tarsi with unsclerotized constriction at the base of the tarsus ( Fig. 1E View FIG ). Three tarsal claws on unsclerotized onychium; paired claws with four, possibly five teeth, unpaired claw simple. Pedipalp rounded and bulbous, 0.37 long, 0.16 wide.
REMARKS
While we are only able to view four spinnerets, we cannot completely rule out the possibility of six, as there may be a very small median pair (this is unlikely since we are able to view inside the opisthosoma to the point of spinneret attachment). Regardless, even if the specimen possesses six spinnerets, this would not change its placement within the Mecysmaucheniidae . Although the archaeids and pararchaeids have six spinnerets, these families do not share the other characters found in our specimen (see family remarks).Additionally, losing spinnerets is a fairly common phenomenon within the Araneae . Extant mecysmaucheniids have lost four spinnerets in the reduction to the two the family currently possesses; given this, it seems quite possible that a primitive mecysmaucheniid would have four, or even six, spinnerets.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.