Phylladothrips Priesner, 1933
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1185.113895 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B1DC236F-8D98-4820-8417-B2F16F350553 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D9914420-380C-5757-BACF-396019F80026 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Phylladothrips Priesner |
status |
|
Phylladothrips Priesner View in CoL
Phylladothrips Priesner, 1933: 79. Type species Phylladothrips karnyi Priesner, 1933, by monotypy.
Paradexiothrips Okajima, 1984: 730. Type species Paradexiothrips bispinosus Okajima, 1984, by monotypy. Synonymised by Okajima 1988: 707.
Note.
Most species of Phylladothrips are found in the tropic and subtropic regions of Asia (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ). However, although described from Taiwan, the distribution of P. pictus extends to the temperate region, where this species was recorded from the Ryukyu Islands, the Izu Islands and Honshu of Japan ( Okajima 2006). Three species of Phylladothrips are found in the subtropics of southern China - Guangxi and southeast of Xizang, where the fauna shares many thrips taxa with Southeast Asian countries and Japan ( Dang et al. 2014). The area between mainland China and Australia is species-rich for thrips, not only both fungal feeding and plant feeding species. At present it is impossible to detect any distribution patterns due to limited exploration.
Diagnosis.
Small-sized fungus-feeders. Head a little wider than long, usually distinctly constricted at base (Figs 2 View Figures 2–5 - 9 View Figures 6–15 ); eyes large, longer than half length of head; postocellar setae usually slender, sometimes long and expanded at apex (Fig. 2 View Figures 2–5 ); postocular setae well developed, expanded at apex; mouth-cone short and rounded, maxillary stylets broad, retracted far into head capsule, maxillary bridge weakly present or absent; antennae 8-segmented, II with campaniform sensorium on apical half of segment, III and IV with 1+2 and 2+2 sense cones respectively (Fig. 3 View Figures 2–5 ). Pronotal am setae reduced, sometimes aa weak as well; major setae expanded at apex (Figs 2 View Figures 2–5 - 9 View Figures 6–15 , 14 View Figures 6–15 ); notopleural sutures incomplete; basantra scarcely present, or absent (Fig. 15 View Figures 6–15 ); meso- and metanotum with weak setae and sculpture, metanotum median setal pair usually relatively long but pointed at apex; mesopresternum eroded medially (Fig. 15 View Figures 6–15 ); metathoracic sternopleural sutures absent; fore tarsi unarmed; fore wings weakly constricted medially, without duplicated cilia (Fig. 17 View Figures 16–23 ). Pelta hat-shaped (Figs 16 View Figures 16–23 , 18 View Figures 16–23 , 20 View Figures 16–23 ), without campaniform sensilla; tergites II-VIII with two pairs of wing-retaining setae (Figs 20-23 View Figures 16–23 ), sometimes VIII with only one posterior pair developed; accessory setae on tergite IX usually elongate but slender, S2 on male tergite IX well developed, about as long as S1 or a little longer (Fig. 5 View Figures 2–5 ); tube shorter than head, anal setae usually shorter than tube; male sternite without pore plate.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Phylladothrips Priesner
Dang, Lihong, An, Yiyan, Okajima, Shuji & Mound, Laurence A. 2023 |
Paradexiothrips
Okajima 1984 |
Paradexiothrips bispinosus
Okajima 1984 |
Phylladothrips
Priesner 1933 |
Phylladothrips karnyi
Priesner 1933 |