Ceradocus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4115.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C0CF41A3-40FB-428E-8933-02115AB0F6E3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3504479 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D8297B13-4D21-5A5E-65AF-3ECCFA37FB86 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ceradocus |
status |
|
Key to Ceradocus species of Australian waters (modified after Sheard 1939)
1. Pleonites with dorsal serrations........................................................................... 2
– Pleonites without dorsal serrations..................................................... C. wooree Berents, 1983
2. Epimera 1–2 bearing only 1–2 (rarely 3) large or small teeth above the posterior distal corner......................... 3
– Epimera 1–2 bearing 5 or more large or small teeth or waves above definitive tooth................................ 11
3. Palm of gnathopod 2, dominant propodus with weakly defined palm corner..................... C. serratus ( Bate, 1862)
– Palm of gnathopod 2, dominant propodus, palm defined by well-developed subacute tooth............................ 4
4. Telson apical robust setae long (greater than telson length)..................................................... 5
– Telson apical robust setae short (less than or equal to telson length).............................................. 7
5. Urosomite 1 with dorsal carina(e). Male gnathopod 2 palm with mulitidentate distomedial shelf....................... 6
– Urosomite 1 dorsally smooth. Male gnathopod 2 palm with subquadrate tooth.................. C. yandala Berents, 1983
6. Epimera 3 posterior margin serrate........................................................................ 7
– Epimeron 3 posterior margin smooth........................................... C. oliveri Appadoo & Myers, 2006
7. Epimera 3 posterior margin strongly serrate......................................... C. crenatipalma Ledoyer, 1979
– Epimeron 3 posterior margin minutely serrate..................................... C. hawaiensis J.L. Barnard, 1955
8. Gnathpod 2 propodus similar in size.......................................................................9
– Gnathopod 2 propodus asymmetrical in size............................................................... 11
9. Gnathopod 2 propodus palm convex, smooth. Uropod 3 rami length 2.5–3 times breadth............................. 9
– Gnathopod 2 propodus palm with teeth. Uropod 3 rami length more than 4 times breadth..................................................................................................... C. circe Lowry & Springthorpe, 2005
10. Telson lobes each with 2 apical robust setae............................................. C. oxyodus Berents, 1983
– Telson lobes each with 3–4 apical robust setae................................. C. cotonensis Appadoo & Myers, 2006
11. Palm of gnathopod 2, dominant propodus nearly transverse............................... C. ramsayi (Haswell, 1880)
– Palm of gnathopod 2, dominant propodus subacute............................................. C. baudini sp. nov.
12. Pleonite 4 with broad dorsal midline gape, rarely bearing midline rudimentary tooth, gape bounded by pair (or more) of large teeth on each side............................................................. C. dooliba J.L. Barnard, 1972a
– Pleonite 4 with teeth at midline, no conspicuous medial gape.................................................. 13
13. Palm of gnathopod 2 nearly transverse, each lobe of telson with more than 2 apical setae....... C. sellickensis Sheard, 1939
– Palm of gnathopod 2 normally oblique, each lobe of telson with only 2 apical setae.... C. rubromaculatus ( Stimpson, 1856)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |