Bromus ciliatus L., 1753
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4367844 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D5FE1F73-170C-28C1-EA33-49E7B4325779 |
treatment provided by |
Admin |
scientific name |
Bromus ciliatus L. |
status |
|
Bromus ciliatus Linnaeus View in CoL , Species Plantarum 1: 76. 1753 View Cited Treatment .
"Habitat in Canada; ex semine. D. Kalm." RCN: 638.
Neotype (McNeill in Taxon 25: 613. 1976): U.S.A. New York: Essex Co. Huntingdon Wildlife Forest Station, Newcomb, sand pit E. of ranger station, 23 Jul 1939, Heady 768 (DAO; iso- US).
Current name: Bromus ciliatus L. View in CoL ( Poaceae ).
Note: Hitchcock (in Contr. U. S. Natl. Herb. 12: 122. 1908) stated that no type was extant. Baum (in Canad. J. Bot. 45: 1849. 1967) referred to a specimen at S, annotated by Linnaeus "H. U. 4 e semine Canadensi" (sheet 40.9), as the “holotype”, with sheet “93.10” at LINN (actually 93.12), annotated on the verso by Linnaeus with "e semine canaden.", an “isotype”. However, McNeill (in Taxon 25: 612-613. 1976) convincingly argued that Baum’s typification was unacceptable because the specimens (LINN 93.10, 93.12 & S 40.9) conflict with Linnaeus’ diagnosis and, in the absence of any relevant original material, he designated a neotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Bromus ciliatus L.
Jarvis, Charlie 2007 |