Ischnothyreus mangun Tong & Li, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1034.63388 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B9316600-4BE6-4587-9BB1-24B575FD405B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0A789285-4F33-40FB-9B2A-8C2A5F165345 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:0A789285-4F33-40FB-9B2A-8C2A5F165345 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Ischnothyreus mangun Tong & Li |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ischnothyreus mangun Tong & Li View in CoL sp. nov. Figures 4 View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5 , 6 View Figure 6 , 20D-F View Figure 20 , 22C, D View Figure 22 , 23C, D View Figure 23
Type material.
Holotype ♂: China, Yunnan, Menghai County, Mangun Stockaded Village, Xishuangbanna Natural Reserve, secondary forest; 22°02 ’12’’ N, 100°23 ’28’’ E; 1179 m; 20.III.2016; S. Li leg. (SYNU-385). Paratype. 1♀: same data as for holotype (SYNU-386).
Diagnosis.
The new species is similar to I. cristiformis sp. nov. and I. xiaolongha sp. nov. in the lamella-like membrane of male palp and the short dorsal scutum of the abdomen, but can be distinguished by the unmodified male cheliceral fang (Fig. 4H, I View Figure 4 ) (vs the large cockscomb-shaped sclerotized process (Fig. 1H-J View Figure 1 ) in I. cristiformis sp. nov. and the tongue-shaped sclerotized process (Fig. 17H-J View Figure 17 ) in I. xiaolongha sp. nov.), the narrow leaf-shaped retrolateral lobe of the male palp (Fig. 5F View Figure 5 ) (vs broad rectangular-shaped (Fig. 2F View Figure 2 ) in I. cristiformis sp. nov. and broad leaf-shaped (Fig. 18F View Figure 18 ) in I. xiaolongha sp. nov.). The female differs from I. cristiformis and I. xiaolongha by the small rectangular-shaped atrium (Fig. 6F View Figure 6 ) (vs the large bowl-shaped atrium (Fig. 3H View Figure 3 ) in I. cristiformis sp. nov. and small bell-shaped atrium (Fig. 19H View Figure 19 ) in I. xiaolongha sp. nov.).
Description.
Male (holotype). Body: habitus as in Fig. 4A-C View Figure 4 ; body length 1.52. Carapace: 0.81 long, 0.61 wide; yellow, with egg-shaped patches behind eyes, surface of elevated portion of pars cephalica smooth, sides finely reticulate, lateral margin straight, smooth (Fig. 4D, E View Figure 4 ). Clypeus: height about 1.3 times ALE diameter (Fig. 4G View Figure 4 ). Eyes: see Fig. 4D, G View Figure 4 . Sternum: pale orange (Fig. 4F View Figure 4 ). Mouthparts: chelicerae, endites and labium orange; chelicerae straight, base of fangs unmodified, fang groove with a few small denticles (Figs 4H, I View Figure 4 , 22C, D View Figure 22 ); anteromedian tip of endites with one strong, tooth-like projection (Fig. 4F View Figure 4 ). Abdomen: 0.65 long, 0.49 wide; dorsal scutum well sclerotized, pale orange, covering 1/3 of the abdomen width and approximately 1/2 of the abdomen length, not fused to epigastric scutum; epigastric and postgastric scutum well sclerotized, pale orange, fused, postgastric scutum covering about 1/2 of the abdomen length (Fig. 4A-C View Figure 4 ). Legs: pale orange, femur I with 2 prolateral spines, tibia I with 4 pairs, metatarsus I with 2 pairs of long ventral spines. Legs II lost. Legs III and IV spineless. Palp: trochanter with ventral projection, cymbium brown; bulb with 2 ventral protuberances, one large and another very small, distal end of bulb stout, with numerous lamella-like membranes, retrolateral lobe narrow leaf-shaped (Figs 5 View Figure 5 , 20D-F View Figure 20 ).
Female (paratype, SYNU-386). Same as male except as noted. Body: body length 1.93. Carapace: 0.80 long, 0.64 wide. Mouthparts: chelicerae and endites unmodified. Abdomen: 1.20 long, 0.81 wide; dorsal scutum very small. Epigastric area: the postgastric scutum with a strongly sclerotized structure in the middle (Fig. 6F View Figure 6 ). Endogyne: from the middle of the slightly thickened margin of the postgastric scutum runs a dark, simple, winding tube posteriorly, ending in a small rectangular shaped atrium (Fig. 23C, D View Figure 23 ).
Etymology.
The specific name is a noun in apposition taken from the type locality.
Distribution.
Known only from the type locality.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |