Miradessus Miller, Benetti & Michat, 2023
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1176.104980 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5C628D23-8893-4955-B260-F4052F4D8193 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1BF90E3E-44AC-4D82-A84C-8953ADCF7798 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:1BF90E3E-44AC-4D82-A84C-8953ADCF7798 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Miradessus Miller, Benetti & Michat |
status |
gen. nov. |
Miradessus Miller, Benetti & Michat gen. nov.
Figs 1-8 View Figures 1–8 , 9-17 View Figures 9–17 , 18-29 View Figures 18–29 , 30 View Figure 30
Type species.
Amarodytes pulchellus Guignot, 1955 by current designation.
Diagnosis.
Miradessus belongs to the tribe Bidessini based on the presence of bisegmented lateral lobes (Figs 10 View Figures 9–17 , 12 View Figures 9–17 , 14 View Figures 9–17 , 16 View Figures 9–17 ) and a spermathecal spine (Fig. 17 View Figures 9–17 ). Within Bidessini , the genus differs from most other genera in the following character combination: 1) occipital line absent (Figs 1-4 View Figures 1–8 ), 2) basal pronotal striae present (Figs 1-4 View Figures 1–8 ), 3) basal elytral stria absent (Figs 1-4 View Figures 1–8 ), 4) sutural elytral stria absent (Figs 1-4 View Figures 1–8 ), 5) transverse carina on elytral epipleuron at humeral angle absent, and 6) distinct marginal bead on anterior clypeal margin absent (Figs 1-4 View Figures 1–8 ). Other genera share these features including Novadessus Miller, 2016, Bidessodes Régimbart, 1900, Neobidessodes Hendrich & Balke, 2009, the Amarodytes duponti group, and Amarodytes segrix Guignot, 1950. But Miradessus differs from all of these in the distinctive shape of the male genitalia (Figs 9-16 View Figures 9–17 ). The male median lobe is very characteristically apically multilobed with a single, dorsal elongate and slender portion and a ventral section that is broad and bilobed (Figs 9 View Figures 9–17 , 11 View Figures 9–17 , 15 View Figures 9–17 ) or flattened and elongate (Fig. 13 View Figures 9–17 ). The lateral lobes are robust, and the bases are large and, in at least some species, covered with conspicuous tubercles (Figs 9 View Figures 9–17 , 13 View Figures 9–17 ). Members of the genus are also superficially quite distinctive from other Bidessini (see more below under Discussion).
Etymology.
This genus is named Miradessus from the Latin miror, meaning to admire, for the impressive color pattern of these beetles, and dessus, a common root for genera in the tribe Bidessini (gender masculine).
Discussion.
The species in this new genus are characterized by lateral lobes that are distinctly two-segmented like the majority of Bidessini taxa ( Biström 1988; Miller et al. 2006; Miller and Bergsten 2014; 2016; Miller 2016b;). Members of typical Amarodytes (including the type species, Amarodytes percosioides Régimbart, 1900) have single-segmented lateral lobes and belong within a clade sister to a clade characterized by two- or three-segmented lateral lobes (Benetti & Miller unpublished). Within the bisegmented lateral-lobe clade, these specimens do not fit well into any other genera (see Diagnosis above). They share some character combinations with Novadessus , Bidessodes , Neobidessodes , the Amarodytes duponti group, and Amarodytes segrix . In some ways they are most superficially similar to members of Bidessodes Régimbart, but specimens in that genus have series of very fine denticles along the posterior margins of the abdominal ventrites ( Miller 2017), which are lacking in Miradessus , and also have distinctly different male genitalia ( Miller 2017). Miradessus are similar to Neobidessodes , but that genus has simple male median lobes unlike the multilobed condition in Miradessus (Figs 9 View Figures 9–17 , 11 View Figures 9–17 , 13 View Figures 9–17 , 15 View Figures 9–17 ). Otherwise, they are not similar to other genera in the tribe and are unique because of the prominently apically multilobed male median lobe (Figs 9 View Figures 9–17 , 11 View Figures 9–17 , 13 View Figures 9–17 , 15 View Figures 9–17 ) which is not found in other genera of Bidessini .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.