Rineloricaria Bleeker, 1862
publication ID |
z01462p001 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6236685 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D345B056-A357-7BEC-CEB9-A9FA3EF366A6 |
treatment provided by |
Thomas |
scientific name |
Rineloricaria Bleeker, 1862 |
status |
|
Rineloricaria Bleeker, 1862 View in CoL View at ENA ZBK .
Type species: Loricaria lima Kner, 1853 ZBK .
Holotype: NMW probably lost ( Isbrücker, 1979), from Brazil according to Natterer.
Gender: feminine.
This genus, by far the most speciose in Loricariinae , is widely distributed on nearly the entire subcontinent, from Costa Rica to Argentina, on both slopes of the Andes. The species inhabit an extremely diverse array of environments. Sexual dimorphism includes hypertrophied development of the odontodes along the sides of the head, on the pectoral spines and rays, and predorsal area of mature males. Several species also show hypertrophied development of the odontodes on the entire caudal peduncle. Rineloricaria ZBK are cavity brooders (pers. obs.). Numerous eggs (often more than 100) are laid attached to one another in single layer masses on the cavity floor, and are brooded by males. Rineloricaria ZBK exhibit high levels of karyotypic diversity with chromosome numbers ranging from 2n = 36 to 2n = 70 in the five species characterized (Kavalco et al. 2005). These authors also described, according to Giuliano-Cataneo (1998), a Robertsonian polymorphism between several populations of R. latirostris , with a variation of 2n = 36 to 2n = 48 chromosomes. If the loss of the holotype of R. lima is confirmed, a neotype must be designated in order to permit all the necessary clarifications for a detailed and much needed revision of this genus. The characters given by Kner (1853), although very detailed, are valid for almost all congeneric species. Without the type locality, it is presently impossible to decide which species represents R. lima . Isbrücker & Nijssen (1976a) and Isbrücker (1981a) proposed the revalidation of Hemiloricaria Bleecker, 1862 ZBK (type species: Hemiloricaria caracasensis ZBK ), but they finally left it in the synonymy of Rineloricaria ZBK because of the lack of sufficient features to split these two genera. In 2001, Isbrücker et al. revalidated Hemiloricaria ZBK and created two new genera: Fonchiiichthys ZBK (type species: Loricaria uracantha ZBK ) and Leliella ZBK (type species: Rineloricaria heteroptera ZBK ) on the basis of subtle differences in the sexual dimorphism. These characters are expressed only during the spawning period and are outweighed by other shared characters used to diagnose Rineloricaria ZBK . Moreover, as specified by Isbrücker & Nijssen (1976a: pp. 110-111) in the description of R. heteroptera ZBK : “As in Spatuloricaria Schultz, 1944 ZBK it shows strong secondary sexual dimorphism: males develop ‘bristles’ along sides of snout, usually also on dorsum of pectoral fin spine and rays, and often dorsum of head, on post-occipital and predorsal scutes. There are specific differences in the development of male bristles”. Following this interpretation, the characters given to define Leliella ZBK and Fonchiiichthys ZBK can be regarded as species specific characters. Herein, Hemiloricaria ZBK , Leliella ZBK , and Fonchiiichthys ZBK are considered as synonyms of Rineloricaria ZBK for lack of sufficient diagnostic features. Forty nine valid species are assigned to this genus considering Ferraris (2003), Knaack (2003), and Rodríguez & Miquelarena (2005).
NMW |
Austria, Wien, Naturhistorisches Museum Wien |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Loricariinae |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Loricariinae |
Genus |