Tupiniquim pronotalis Linzmeier, Oliveira & Konstantinov, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5068.1.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4DAB2CFA-B192-434D-A697-8B1067BBFDED |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5702255 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D26D412E-FFFF-8F54-FF14-F5198449FD9F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tupiniquim pronotalis Linzmeier, Oliveira & Konstantinov |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tupiniquim pronotalis Linzmeier, Oliveira & Konstantinov , new species
( Figs 23–28 View FIGURE 23 View FIGURES 24–26 View FIGURES 27–28 )
Diagnosis. Tupiniquim pronotalis can easily be differentiated from T. confusa (in parenthesis) by the following features: four setiferous pores on each side of vertex organized in two longitudinal lines (setiferous pores form a small cluster of three on each side of vertex near eyes); posterior margin of pronotum with two small depressions (posterior margin of pronotum without depressions); pronotal surface almost smooth, with minute punctures (pronotal surface finely textured); elytra with punctures barely organized in rows (elytra with punctures confusedly organized); media n lobe of aedeagus at apex straight in lateral view (median lobe of aedeagus bent ventrally).
Description. Body 1.62–1.72 mm long and 0.91–0.97 mm wide. Color reddish brown, except antennae and legs light brown. Frons and vertex in the same plane. Supraorbital pore almost indistinguishable from three or four setiferous pores placed in a longitudinal line ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 24–26 ). Ridge from inner margin of antennal socket to eye inclined towards insertion of antenna ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 24–26 ). Pronotum rectangular, width 1.46 times length ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 ). Posterior margin of pronotum with two small depressions close to posterior angles ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27–28 ). Surface of pronotum almost smooth, with both minute punctures and short pilosity almost imperceptible. Elytra with punctures, weakly organized in rows ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 24–26 ).
Median lobe simple, tubular, in ventral view lateral expansion slightly shorter and closer to apex, apex with short, wide denticle; in lateral view abruptly curved basally, apex straight ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 27–28 ).
Type material. Holotype: male ( DZUP). Brazil: Bahia; nr. Itubera , 100-200m; Michelin Ecolog. Res.; 23- 27.XI.2012; S. & Sv. Kurbatov, leg. / Holotype, Tupiniquim pronotalis Linzmeier, Oliveira & Konstantinov , sp. nov. 2021 [red label].
Paratypes (5): 1 female ( DZUP) ; 2 males ( USNM) / Brazil: Bahia; S of Itubera 100 m; Michelin ecolog. Res. ; 22-26.XI.2012; S. & Sv. Kurbatov, legs. / Tupiniquim pronotalis det. Linzmeier, Oliveira & Konstantinov, sp. nov. 2021 . 1 male ( UFFS-RE) / Brasil-BA; Jequié ( Brejo Novo ); REF. SP 17; 13º56’41”S e 40º06’33,9”W; 15/XII/2007; Carneiro, M.A.F. / Tupiniquim pronotalis Linzmeier, Oliveira & Konstantinov , sp. nov. 2021 [antennae broken] GoogleMaps . 1 male ( UFFS-RE) same data, except Brasil-BA; Jequié ( Brejo Novo ); REF. SP 17; 13º56’41”S e 40º06’33,9”W; VII/2009; Carneiro, M.A.F. / Tupiniquim pronotalis det. Linzmeier, Oliveira & Konstantinov, sp. nov. 2021 [left antenna broken] GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific epithet refers to one of the distinctive characteristics of this species, its large pronotum that in this species has two small depressions on posterior margin.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |