Stenopsyche marmorata Navás, 1920
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.12651/JSR.2020.9.3.288 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13141254 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D1070957-FF82-F620-D537-FD19FC3427B8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Stenopsyche marmorata Navás, 1920 |
status |
|
32. Stenopsyche marmorata Navás, 1920 View in CoL
Oi쟁이각날AE래
Stenopsyche marmorata Navás, 1920 View in CoL : Revista Ac Cienc Madrid 18, 164, f 6a - b; Botosaneanu 1970, 295, N (HGB, PB), M, F; Kim 1974, 9, f 24, S (CB, GB, GG, GW, JB), L; Kobayashi 1989, 1, S (GN, GW), M, F; Mey 1989, 300, N (NGW, PB, RG), M, F; Kumanski 1992, 57, f 18 - 19, N (HGB, NGW, PB), M, F; Hwang 2006, 52 - 53, f 116 - 120, S (GG, GW, JJ), F; Oláh et al. 2018, 103, N (HGB, NGW, PB), M.
Stenopsyche griseipennis McLachlan, 1866 View in CoL : Martynov 1926, 288, Korea (Pung-Tung), M; Tsuda 1942a, 229 - 230, N (HGB, RG), M, F. Misidentification mentioned by Kimmins (1958) and Schmid (1969). Yoon and Kim 1988, 446 - 447, f 4, S (GB, GG, GN, GW, JJ, JN), L; Yoon and Kim 1989a, 26 - 27, f 1 - 3, S (GB, GG, GN, GW, JJ, JN), L; Lee and Kim 1993, 267, N (RG), L. Misidentification.
Remarks. The records of S. griseipennis from East Asia were misidentifications of this species ( Kimmins, 1958; Schmid, 1969), but Yoon and Kim (1988; 1989a) and Lee and Kim (1993) did not refer to Kimmins (1958) and Schmid (1969).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Stenopsyche marmorata Navás, 1920
Kong, Sun-Jin Park and Dongsoo 2020 |
Stenopsyche marmorata Navás, 1920
Navas 1920 |
Stenopsyche griseipennis
McLachlan 1866 |