Clytia Lamouroux, 1812

Schuchert, Peter & Collins, Richard, 2021, Hydromedusae observed during night dives in the Gulf Stream, Revue suisse de Zoologie 128 (2), pp. 237-356 : 312

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.35929/RSZ.0049

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8382D1CA-7C0E-4B1C-9591-4CEAA2F296FB

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5640054

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D0118A7C-5B40-0058-FEDA-FD97FD9E7DC7

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Clytia Lamouroux, 1812
status

 

Genus Clytia Lamouroux, 1812 View in CoL View at ENA

Synonymy: See Calder (1991).

Diagnosis: Medusa with normal, curved umbrella. Manubrium short, with four short perradial lips. Velum present. Normally four radial canals, but some aberrant form may have more. Marginal tentacles>16, with hollow bulbs; without many permanent, small, conical atentaculate bulbs, no excretory papillae. With many statocysts (>16), usually as many or more as tentacles, no ocelli, no cirri. Gonads on radial canals, usually short, not in contact with manubrium.

Hydroid typical for family, colonial, stolonal or erect branched, monosiphonic or polysiphonic. Hydrothecae deep, campanulate, hydrothecal rim sinuous or deeply indented true hydrothecal diaphragm, gonotheca conical.

Remarks: Very few nominal species of Clytia medusae are unambiguously identifiable. Most morphological characters used to distinguish Clytia species fall in the range of variation that can be expected in a single species and having little or no taxonomic value ( Lindner & Migotto, 2002; Bouillon et al., 2006). Species identification requires usually knowledge of the entire life cycle. A recent extensive molecular phylogeny of the Campanulariidae ( Cunha et al., 2017) found even more taxonomic inconsistencies, and also provides an excellent framework for barcoding studies. The 16S data set of the latter study was used in a maximum likelihood phylogeny to search for relationships of the sequences obtained in this study. The tree is not shown here due to it size and the sparse results.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF