Wuvulidae, Peter, 2021
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.35929/RSZ.0049 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5710626 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D0118A7C-5B36-002E-FC21-FC2EFB487F63 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Wuvulidae |
| status |
fam. nov. |
Wuvulidae View in CoL new family
Diagnosis: Medusa with more than four radial canals, sometimes partially ramified; tentacle bulbs and atentaculate bulbs with lateral sac-like appendages; large adaxial excretory papillae on marginal tentacular bulbs. Gonads on radial canals. No ocelli, no statocysts. Hydroid unknown.
Remarks: Bouillon et al. (1988b) when introducing the genus Wuvula included it in the family Laodiceidae based on the assertion that the appendages of the marginal bulbs resemble cordyli. Pendant cordyli ( e.g. Fig. 29C View Fig ) are typical for the Laodiceidae , but they also occur in the Hebellidae . They occur mostly on the bell margin, but may also be placed on marginal bulbs. The hollow appendages in Wuvula ( Fig. 36F View Fig ) are clearly not cordyli and also their paired position on the side of bulbs is not known for cordyli in the Laodiceidae . The genus must thus be removed from the Laodiceidae . Wuvula lacks ocelli, statocysts, and cordyli and could be related to the Melicertidae Agassiz, 1862 which also lack them. The absence of statocysts and cordyli is, however, likely a plesiomorphy and not suitable for postulating a relationship. Moreover, the 16S data of W. ochracea did not indicate relationship to any group (results not shown, but see below).
We therefore propose that the genus is accommodated in a new family Wuvulidae . Its diagnosis is given above and taken from the genus diagnosis.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
