Merga violacea ( Agassiz & Mayer, 1899 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.35929/RSZ.0049 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5705878 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D0118A7C-5B07-0019-FC45-F990FC2D79B9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Merga violacea ( Agassiz & Mayer, 1899 ) |
status |
|
Merga violacea ( Agassiz & Mayer, 1899) View in CoL View at ENA
Fig. 6 View Fig A-E
Pandea violacea Agassiz & Mayer, 1899: 160 View in CoL . – Mayer, 1900: 34, pl. 1 fig. 1. – Bigelow, 1909: 205, pl. 41, figs 10- 11. – Mayer, 1910: 119, text fig. 64, pl. 11 fig. 7, pl. 12 fig. 1.
Mergintha lobiancoi Hartlaub, 1914: 250 View in CoL , fig. 205. – Kramp, 1953: 265, synonym.
Merga violacea View in CoL . – Hartlaub, 1914: 249, fig. 204, new combination. – Kramp, 1953: 265. – Kramp, 1959a: 116, fig. 106. – Kramp, 1961: 107. – Kramp, 1968: 41, fig. 104. – Schuchert, 2007: 355, fig. 69.
? not Merga violacea View in CoL . – Menon, 1932: 7, pl. 1 fig. 10. [? = Pandeopsis ikarii View in CoL ]
Examined material: BFLA4006 ; 1 specimen; 26 -NOV- 2018; size 12 mm high, 10 mm wide, pink colour; photographed and preserved in ethanol for DNA extraction; 16S sequence MW528650 View Materials . – 30-JUN- 2018; 1 specimen photographed; size approximately 7 mm, pink, only 2 rudimentary bulbs between tentacle pairs; not collected . – 09-AUG-2018; 1 specimen photographed; size approximately 10 mm, pink; not collected.
Observations: Typical medusa of the genus Merga , up to 12 mm high, characteristic light pink-purple colour of manubrium and tentacles ( Fig. 6 View Fig A-E), without apical process but when fully grown with a thick apical jelly, shallow subumbrellar pockets present. Manubrium about half the height of subumbrella, very wide, connected for about half its length along the radial canals; stomach base and mouth cruciform, mouth rim slightly folded. Gonads on interradial surfaces of stomach, thin, smooth and not folded. Four radial canals broad, connected to stomach in its upper parts as mesenteries. Eight long, tapering tentacles, base laterally compressed and clasping bell margin, may be continued on exumbrella as an atypical, flat, abaxial spur ( Fig. 6B View Fig ); large red abaxial ocellus near abaxial end of bulb. Rarely also 9 tentacles observed. Alternating with the tentacles 2-5 small bulbs (max. total 34) with a short, blunt tentacle stump, all the same size and also with a red ocellus. Usually with brown pigment dots in the stomach wall ( Fig. 6C, E View Fig ).
Distribution: Circumglobal in tropical to subtropical waters ( Schuchert, 2007). Type locality: Fiji Islands.
16S Data: The partial 16S gene sequence ( MW528650 View Materials ) obtained was used to search for similar sequences in GenBank using the blastn function. Other similar sequences found were as expected of Pandeidae species but had only identities below 89%. The similarities with the Pandeopsis species described below were also relatively low (<86%, see also Fig. 8 View Fig ).
Remarks: The species has recently been redescribed and discussed by Schuchert (2007), but the problem with the type locality remains unresolved. No type material could be located in the Harvard Museum of Zoology (A. Baldinger, pers. com. June 2019), the museum Agassiz and Mayer were associated with.
Agassiz & Mayer (1899) introduced the name Pandea violacea in a paper reporting on medusae collected in the Fiji archipelago. In the description – no figure was given – they state that they have also found indistinguishable medusae at the Dry Tortugas Islands which they intended to illustrate in a subsequent publication. Notwithstanding, the paper dealt with specimens from Fiji and therefore the Fiji Archipelago should be considered as the type locality of the species. This could be taxonomically important if future genetic studies show that the two populations belong to separate species.
In one of our specimens (BFLA4006), some tentacle bulbs had atypical abaxial spurs formed by thickening of the exumbrellar epithelium ( Fig. 6B View Fig ). Several specimens also had brown dots in the stomach wall ( Fig. 6A, C View Fig ). There seem to be differences between Pacific and Atlantic individuals, including the colouration (comp. Bigelow, 1909; or Schuchert, 2020: photos of Australian Merga violacea ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Filifera |
Family |
|
Genus |
Merga violacea ( Agassiz & Mayer, 1899 )
Schuchert, Peter & Collins, Richard 2021 |
Mergintha lobiancoi
Kramp P. L. 1953: 265 |
Hartlaub C. 1914: 250 |
Merga violacea
Schuchert P. 2007: 355 |
Kramp P. L. 1968: 41 |
Kramp P. L. 1961: 107 |
Kramp P. L. 1959: 116 |
Kramp P. L. 1953: 265 |
Hartlaub C. 1914: 249 |
Pandea violacea
Mayer A. G. 1910: 119 |
Bigelow H. B. 1909: 205 |
Mayer A. G. 1900: 34 |
Agassiz A. & Mayer A. G. 1899: 160 |