Strubellia paradoxa ( Strubell , 1892)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2010.521862 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CF23C83D-9D3B-FFB3-F9ED-FB4EFB9D68E2 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2021-08-17 14:27:46, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-04 02:20:52) |
scientific name |
Strubellia paradoxa ( Strubell , 1892) |
status |
|
Strubellia paradoxa ( Strubell, 1892) View in CoL
Acochlidium paradoxum Strubell, 1892 View in CoL : Verhandl. naturh. Verein preuss. Rheinlande,
48. Jahrg., Sitzung d. niederrhein. Ges. 13. Juni 1892: 62
Acochlidium paradoxum Küthe 1935 View in CoL : Zool. Jahrb. Syst. 66: 513–540
Strubellia paradoxa Odhner 1937 View in CoL : Zool. Anz. 120: 237–238
The bipartite copulatory apparatus and complex kidney identify S. paradoxa View in CoL as a member of the hedylopsacean Acochlidia , ( Wawra 1987) whereas the limnic habitat separates it from the smaller but otherwise rather similar Pseudunela species. Strubellia paradoxa View in CoL differs from the likewise limnic Acochlidium species in the following characters: a uniformly coloured body with an elongate visceral sac more or less round in cross-section, very slender median cusps of the rhachidian teeth, a copulatory apparatus with only a single penial spine and a stylet-bearing basal finger that is larger than the penis, and in being a sequential hermaphrodite (see Wawra 1988; Neusser and Schrödl 2009; Schrödl and Neusser 2010 for discussion).
Strubellia paradoxa View in CoL differs from Strubellia View in CoL “ paradoxa View in CoL ” sensu Wawra (1974, 1988) from the Solomon Islands and, apparently, Vanuatu (mentioned in Haynes 2000; own unpublished data) in the length and form of the basal finger’s stylet: in S. paradoxa View in CoL , the stylet is approximately 0.5–0.6 mm long [measured from Küthe (1935) and 3D reconstruction; see Figures 6C View Figure 6 , 7E View Figure 7 ], has a continuous curve and is rather stout compared with that of Strubellia View in CoL from the Solomon islands. There, it is approximately 1 mm long, slender and has a hooked tip ( Wawra 1974: fig. 4).
We are currently processing specimens for DNA analysis to determine whether there are genetic differences between the Ambon, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu populations.
Haynes A. 2000. The distribution of freshwater gastropods on four Vanuatu islands: Espiritu Santo, Pentecost, Efate and Tanna (South Pacific). Ann Limnol. 36 (2): 101 - 111.
Kuthe P. 1935. Organisation und systematische Stellung des Acochlidium paradoxum Strubell. Zool Jahrb Abt Syst. 66 (6): 513 - 540.
Neusser TP, Schrodl M. 2009. Between Vanuatu tides: 3 D anatomical reconstruction of a new brackish water acochlidian gastropod from Espiritu Santo. Zoosystema 31: 453 - 469.
Odhner N Hj. 1937. Strubellia, eine neue Gattung der Acochlidiacea. Zool Anz. 120: 237 - 238.
Schrodl M, Neusser TP. 2010. Towards a phylogeny and evolution of Acochlidia (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia). Zool J Linn Soc. 158: 124 - 154.
Strubell A. 1892. Sitzung der naturwissenschaftlichen Sektion vom 13. Juni 1892. Verhandl naturh Verein preuss Rheinlande, Bonn. 48: 56 - 62.
Wawra E. 1974. The rediscovery of Strubellia paradoxa (Strubell) (Gastropoda: Euthyneura: Acochlidiacea) on the Solomon Islands. Veliger 17: 8 - 10.
Wawra E. 1987. Zur Anatomie einiger Acochlidia (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia) mit einer vorlaufigen Revision des Systems und einem Anhang uber Platyhedylidae (Opisthobranchia, Ascoglossa) [Dissertation]. [Vienna]: Universitat Wien.
Wawra E. 1988. Strubellia paradoxa (Strubell, 1892) (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia) von den Salomon-Inseln. Zool Anz. 220: 163 - 172.
Figure 6. Schematic overview of the genital system, male phase. (A) Overview of posterior genital system of paratype, ∗ indicates genital pore, ∗∗ indicates widening in distal bursa stalk, dorsal view; (B) overview of cephalic copulatory apparatus of paratype, dorsal view; (C, D) adapted from Küthe (1935), used with permission: (C) copulatory apparatus with anterior muscle (showing external duct with distal bifurcation and bypass leading into lumen and groove of the stylet) and posterior muscle (with duct passing through the retractor muscle and exiting through a papilla close to a hooked thorn); (D) cross-section of stylet showing lumen and groove. Abbreviations: am, ampulla; bc, bursa copulatrix; bf, basal finger; bp, bypass of paraprostatic duct; bvd, “posterior-leading” vas deferens; dv, diverticle; ed, ejaculatory duct on raised papilla; gd, gonoduct; go, gonad; gr, groove of cuticular stylet; m1, “anterior” muscle, confused with the penis by Küthe; m2, “horseshoe-shaped posterior” muscle; p, penis; pp, paraprostate; ppd, paraprostatic duct; pr, prostate; ps, penial sheath; rm, retractor muscle of copulatory apparatus; rs, receptaculum seminis; sg, external sperm groove on right body side; st, hollow stylet; th, thorn.
Figure 7. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the genital system, male phase. (A) Genital system (right view); (B) posterior genital system (oblique anterior view); (C) detail of distal gonoduct and genital opening (right view); (D) complete genital system (ventral view); (E) copulatory apparatus (anteroventral view); (F) copulatory apparatus (right view, ∗ indicates blind ending of paraprostate; prostate and penial sheath omitted). Abbreviations: am, ampulla; bc, bursa copulatrix; bf, basal finger; bp, bypass of paraprostatic duct; bs, bursa stalk; bvd, “posterior-leading” vas deferens; dv, diverticle; ed, ejaculatory duct; gd, gonoduct; go, gonad; gol, central lumen of gonad; gp, genital pore; gpa, anterior genital opening; p, penis; pp, paraprostate; ppd, paraprostatic duct, pr, prostate; ps, penial sheath; rm, retractor muscle; rs, receptaculum seminis; sg, external sperm groove; st, stylet; th, thorn. Scale bars: A, 1 mm; B, D–F, 250 µm; C, 100 µm.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Strubellia paradoxa ( Strubell , 1892)
Brenzinger, B., Neusser, T. P., Glaubrecht, M., Haszprunar, G. & Schrödl, M. 2010 |
Strubellia paradoxa
Odhner 1937 |
S. paradoxa
Odhner 1937 |
Strubellia paradoxa
Odhner 1937 |
Strubellia paradoxa
Odhner 1937 |
Strubellia
Odhner 1937 |
paradoxa
Odhner 1937 |
S. paradoxa
Odhner 1937 |
Strubellia
Odhner 1937 |
Acochlidium paradoxum Küthe 1935
Kuthe 1935 |
Acochlidium paradoxum
Strubell 1892 |