Pholcus cheni Yao & Li, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4306.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:65F64B80-9766-4AC4-AA6E-6D84014F5E63 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5328549 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD7487FD-FFE5-FFCA-10EA-FE8EFBF9F9E5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pholcus cheni Yao & Li |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pholcus cheni Yao & Li View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 13–14 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14
Type material. Holotype: male (Ar29665), Sumano Cave (7°35.172′N, 99°52.078′E, elevation 76 m), Srinakarind District , Rattalung, Thailand, 27 October 2015, Q. Zhao, G. Zhou and Z. Chen leg. Paratypes: 2 males and 2 females (Ar 29666–29669), same data as holotype. GoogleMaps
Etymology. The specific name is a patronym in honor of the collector Z. Chen; noun (name) in genitive case.
Diagnosis. This species resembles P. khaolek Huber, 2016 (see Huber et al. 2016c: 21, figs 52–53, 63–78, 99– 101) with similar male chelicerae ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 D), procursus ( Figs 13 View FIGURE 13 C–D), bulbal apophyses ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 C) and epigynum ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 A) but can be distinguished by the male pedipalp trochanter apophysis broad proximally but very narrow distally ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 B), by the anterior arch heavily sclerotized medially on the vulva (arrow in Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 B) and by the more separated pore plates ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 B).
Description. Male (holotype): Total length Total length 4.40 (4.74 with clypeus), carapace 1.28 long, 1.44 wide, opisthosoma 3.12 long, 1.38 wide. Leg I: 54.71 (12.69 + 0.63 + 13.27 + 26.09 + 2.03), leg II: – (9.17 + 0.63 + 8.97 + 15.06 + –), leg III: – (6.09 + 0.58 + – + – + –), leg IV: 28.23 (8.72 + 0.63 + 5.75 + 11.93 + 1.20); tibia I L/ d: 104. Distance PME-PME 0.34; diameter PME 0.10; distance PME-ALE 0.04; distance AME-AME 0.05; diameter AME 0.06. Sternum wider than long (0.94/0.70). Habitus as in Figs 14 View FIGURE 14 E–F. Carapace yellowish, with brown marks on posterior half; ocular area yellowish; sternum yellowish, with brownish marks. Legs yellowish, patellae, distal parts of tibiae and proximal part of metatarsi dark brown, without darker rings. Opisthosoma yellowish, without spots. Ocular area elevated, each eye triad on top of a laterally directed eye-stalk, and provided with modified setae. Thoracic furrow absent. Chelicerae as in Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 D, with a pair of proximo-lateral apophyses, a pair of distal apophyses, each with two cone-shaped teeth, and a pair of frontal apophyses. Pedipalps as in Figs 13 View FIGURE 13 A–B; trochanter with a long and large ventral apophysis, broad proximally but very narrow distally; femur proximally widened on ventral side, with a dorsal apophysis proximally (arrow in Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 B); procursus simple proximally but complex distally, with a membranous, fringed prolateral process subdistally (arrow in Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 D); bulbal apophyses as in Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 C; uncus with a scaly edge; appendix swollen distally, with a retrolateral apophysis subdistally; embolus weakly sclerotized. Retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia I at 7%; legs with short vertical setae on tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi; without spines and curved setae; tarsus I with 14 distinct pseudosegments.
Female: Similar to male, habitus as in Figs 14 View FIGURE 14 G–H. Total length 4.09 (4.49 with clypeus), carapace 1.12 long, 1.30 wide, opisthosoma 2.97 long, 1.31 wide; tibia I: 9.74; tibia I L/d: 70. Distance PME-PME 0.22; diameter PME 0.11; distance PME-ALE 0.03; distance AME-AME 0.03; diameter AME 0.05. Sternum wider than long (0.83/ 0.69). Ocular area without eye-stalks. Epigynum ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 A) with a knob. Vulva ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 B) with a medially heavily sclerotized anterior arch and two nearly elliptic pore plates.
Variation: Tibia I in male paratype (n=1, leg I lost in the other specimen): 13.85. Tibia I in another female paratype: 9.42.
Distribution. Thailand (Rattalung, type locality; Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 ).
Natural History. The species was found in the entrance zone of the cave.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.