Alternaria cunninghamiicola Lin Huang, Jiao He & D.W. Li, 2024
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.101.115370 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD5CDB09-EAFE-50CF-A430-EAF00E9161DA |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Alternaria cunninghamiicola Lin Huang, Jiao He & D.W. Li |
status |
sp. nov. |
Alternaria cunninghamiicola Lin Huang, Jiao He & D.W. Li sp. nov.
Fig. 3 View Figure 3
Holotype.
China, Jiangsu Province, Nanjing City, Dongshanqiao Forest Farm, 31°51'11"N, 118°46'12"E, isolated from leaf spots of Cunninghamia lanceolata , May 2017, Wen-Li Cui, (holotype: CFCC 59358). Holotype specimen is a living specimen being maintained via lyophilisation at the China Forestry Culture Collection Center (CFCC). Ex-type (DSQ3-2) is maintained at the Forest Pathology Laboratory, Nanjing Forestry University.
Etymology.
The specific epithet refers to the genus of the host plant ( Cunninghamia lanceolata ).
Host/distribution.
From C. lanceolata in Dongshanqiao Forest Farm, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, China.
Description.
Mycelium superficial on the PCA, composed of septate, branched, smooth, thin-walled, pale white to grey hyphae. Conidiophores macronematous, mononematous, solitary, subcylindrical, branched or unbranched, straight or geniculate, thin-walled, 2-10 septate, (18.3-)25.3-68.4(-93.8) × (3.0-)3.3-4.2(-4.8) μm, (mean ± SD = 46.9 ± 21.6 × 3.7 ± 0.5 μm, n = 32), arising mostly at right angles from undifferentiated hyphae, with conspicuous scars after conidia have seceded. Conidiogenous cells apical or subapical, cylindrical, light brown, smooth, (5.2-)7.3-14.0(-18.1) × (2.5-)3.0-4.2(-5.0) μm, (mean ± SD = 10.7 ± 3.3 × 3.6 ± 0.6 μm, n = 45), mono- or polytretic, with conspicuous scars at the loci of sporulating after conidia have seceded. Each conidiogenous locus bears a primary chain of 3-5 conidia with rarely lateral branches or occasionally a sole secondary conidium. Conidia pale brown to brown, shape varied, ovoid or ellipsoid, pyriform or obclavate, usually smooth; conidial bodies (12.2-)18.1-35.4(-51.6) × (7.5-)10.4-15.5(-18.7) μm, (mean ± SD = 26.6 ± 8.6 × 12.9 ± 2.6 μm, n = 53), with 1-5 transverse and 0-2 longitudinal septate. Secondary conidia directly (but rarely) produced by conidia through an inconspicuous apical conidiogenous locus or (commonly) by means of a short apical or lateral secondary conidiophore with 1-2 cells in length. Secondary conidiophores (false beaks) with one or a few conidiogenous loci, (4.5-)5.2-22.5(-32.7) × (2.7-)3.2-4.2(-4.7) μm, (mean ± SD = 13.8 ± 8.7 × 3.7 ± 0.5 μm, n = 31). Beakless conidia mostly with a conical cell at the apex. Chlamydospores not observed.
Culture characteristics.
Colonies on PCA incubated at 25 °C in the dark growing at 9.3 ± 0.1 mm/d; aerial hypha cottony, white to pale grey; reverse centre dark green to black; sporulation sparse; diffusible pigment absent.
Additional materials examined.
China, Jiangsu Province, Nanjing City, Dongshanqiao Forest Farm, 31°51'11"N, 118°46'12"E, isolated from leaf spots of Cunninghamia lanceolata , May 2017, Wen-Li Cui, DSQ3-2-1, DSQ3-2-2, DSQ3-2-3, DSQ3-2-4 GoogleMaps .
Notes.
The isolates of A. cunninghamiicola were phylogenetically close to A. broussonetiae (ex-type, CBS 121455), A. yali-inficiens (ex-type, CBS 121547), A. seleniiphila (ex-type, CBS 127671) and A. lini (ex-type, CBS 106.34) (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ). Between A. cunninghamiicola isolates and A. broussonetiae (ex-type, CBS 121455), there were 1/453 differences in Alt a1, 4/510 in ITS and 1/664 in OPA10-2. Between A. cunninghamiicola isolates and A. yali-inficiens (ex-type, CBS 121547), there were 1/453 differences in Alt a1, 2/499 in GAPDH, 3/510 in ITS and 1/401 in endoPG. Between A. cunninghamiicola isolates and A. seleniiphila (ex-type, CBS 127671), there were 1/453 differences in Alt a1, 2/499 in GAPDH, 3/510 in ITS, 1/401 in endoPG and 6/757 in RPB2. Between A. cunninghamiicola isolates and A. lini (ex-type, CBS 106.34), there were 1/453 differences in Alt a1, 2/499 in GAPDH, 4/510 in ITS, 1/887 in LSU, 1/664 in OPA10-2 and 6/757 in RPB2. The PHI analysis showed that there was no significant recombination between A. cunninghamiicola isolates and its related species (Φw = 0.2087) (Fig. 2C View Figure 2 ). Distinguishing characteristics of this new species and other related species of Alternaria spp. are shown in Table 2 View Table 2 . Morphologically, conidia in chains of the A. cunninghamiicola isolates were less than those of A. broussonetiae CBS 121455 (ex-type) (3-5 vs. 8-15 conidia) ( Zhang et al. 1999) and A. yali-inficiens CBS 121547 (ex-type) (3-5 vs. 8-18 conidia) ( Roberts 2005). Conidiophores of the A. cunninghamiicola isolates were shorter than those of A. seleniiphila CBS 127671 (ex-type) (25.3-68.4 × 3.3-4.2 μm vs. 80-250 × 4-5 μm) ( Wangeline and Reeves 2007). Conidia of the A. cunninghamiicola isolates were shorter and wider than those of A. lini CBS 106.34 (ex-type) (18.1-35.4 × 10.4-15.5 μm vs. 42-60 × 3-7 μm) ( Dey 1933). Thus, the phylogenetic and morphological evidence support this fungus being a new species within the Alternaria alternata species complex.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |