Horniella hongkongensis Yin and Li

Yin, Zi-Wei & Li, Li-Zhen, 2014, Revision of the Oriental genus Horniella Raffray (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae), Zootaxa 3850 (1), pp. 1-83 : 21-22

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3850.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BFD1F483-4255-429B-9E17-8D4A9E559C5F

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6142727

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD490758-D804-FFFE-FF01-47994031FE7F

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Horniella hongkongensis Yin and Li
status

sp. nov.

5. Horniella hongkongensis Yin and Li , new species

Figs 10 View FIGURE 10 A, 11, 48C; Map 1 View MAP 1

Type material (3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀). Holotype, ♂, labeled ‘ HONG KONG, iii.1996 (HK iv.96) G. de Rougemont / Holotype [red], ♂, Horniella hongkongensis sp. n., det. Yin & Li, 2014, MHNG’ . Paratypes: 1 ♀, same label data as the holotype ( MHNG) ; 1 ♂, 1♀, labeled ‘ SBH-96/17 . HONG KONG (new Territroies): Tai Po Kau Nature Reserve [22°25’41’’N, 114°10’49’’E], après la grande place de picnic, prélèvement de sol près d’un arbre mort mais debout, 150 m; 9.xii.1996; leg. B. Hauser (extr. par app. Berlese à GE-CH) SBH-96/17 ’ ( MHNG) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂, labeled ‘ China: Hong Kong, New Territories , Tsuen Wan , Tai Mo Shan , forest nr. Sze Lok Yuen hostel, 22°24’18’’N, 114°07’06’’E, ca. 640 m, rotten wood, 05.iv.2013, X.B. Song leg.’ ( SNUC) GoogleMaps .Each paratype bears a yellow type label similar to that of the holotype except ‘ Paratype [yellow] ♂ or ♀’.

Description. Male ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 A). Length 3.0– 3.14 mm. Head slightly longer than wide, HL 0.65–0.68 mm, HW 0.64–0.65 mm; anterolateral genal projections ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 C) distinct, anterior margins evenly concave; median sulcus between antennal tubercles short; scapes ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 B) slightly expanded at basolateral margins; clubs ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A) loosely formed by apical three moderately enlarged antennomeres; venter with pair of moderately thick lateral spines ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 D). Maxillary palpomeres II stout, broadened at middle. Each eye composed of about 40 facets. Pronotum slightly longer than wide, PL 0.67–0.68 mm, PW 0.62–0.63 mm. Elytra wider than long, EL 0.86–0.87 mm, EW 1.23–1.29 mm; discal striae reaching apical 2/3 of elytral length. Protrochanters and profemora ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 E) each with one distinct ventral spine, protibiae ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 F) each with one small preapical denticle; mesotrochanters ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 G) each with one small, but distinct ventral spine, mesofemora simple, mesotibiae ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 H) simple; tarsomeres II normal, not extending to beneath tarsomeres III. Abdomen large, AL 0.82–0.91 mm, AW 1.46–1.50 mm, tergite IV (first visible tergite) with median carina extending to nearly half tergal length, lateral discal carinae short, tergite V lacking median carina. Sternite IX ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 I) nearly oval, with well-sclerotized apical half and membranous basal half. AeL 1.20–1.25 mm; aedeagus ( Figs 11 View FIGURE 11 J–L) with slightly asymmetric median lobe regularly curved rightwards in dorso-ventral view; endophallus composed of one conspicuously long, twisted sclerite with pointed, curved apex, and one much shorter, nearly straight sclerite at base of long one.

Female. Similar to male in general appearance; scapes not expanded at basolateral margins; each eye composed of about 22–25 facets; profemora each with two subequal ventral spines near base, mesotrochanters lacking ventral spine. BL 3.09–3.29 mm, HL 0.67–0.70 mm, HW 0.59–0.61 mm, PL 0.67–0.68 mm, PW 0.65–0.67 mm, EL 0.79–0.82 mm, EW 1.25–1.28, AL 0.96–1.09 mm, AW 1.33–1.34 mm. Genital complex ( Fig. 48 View FIGURE 48 C) with moderately sclerotized, transverse apical portion, and membranous, elongate basal portion.

Differential diagnosis. This species is placed as a member of the H. burckhardti group. All species of this group are more or less morphologically similar to each other, and can be best separated by the aedeagal structure combined with their distributions. Horniella hongkongensis shares with H. burckhardti the evenly concave anterior margins of the anterolateral genal projections, similar placement of spines on the fore and mid legs, and aedeagal form. These two species can be distinguished by the less distinctly expanded basolateral margins of the scapes, shorter median carina of tergite IV, and the aedeagal endophallus with two sclerites in H. hongkongensis , while H. burckhardti has the scapes distinctly roundly expanded at the basolateral margins, the median carina of tergite IV being extending nearly through the tergal length, and the aedeagal endophallus with one long and two short sclerites.

Comments. The slight different form of the aedeagal endophallus in the populations from Tai Po Kau (alt. ca. 250 m, Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 J) and Tai Mo Shan (alt. 640 m, Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 L) are considered intraspecific variation, while other male features are quite stable.

Distribution. South China: Hong Kong ( Map 1 View MAP 1 ).

Collection notes. One paratype from Tai Po Kau was extracted from litter samples from a mixed broad-leaved forest by use of a Berlese funnel; the other paratype from Tai Mo Shan was collected by hand on a rotten wood.

Etymology. The specific name is taken from the type locality Hong Kong.

MHNG

Museum d'Histoire Naturelle

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF