Otacilia triangula, Mu & Jin & Zhang, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5134.2.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:80228D23-3181-4B6F-842F-3956D6459ECC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6534909 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD43878C-FFED-FE31-FF42-FDE1FDD6FD7F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Otacilia triangula |
status |
sp. nov. |
Otacilia triangula View in CoL sp. nov. (三ĦÞffifl)
Figs 10A–B View FIGURE 10 , 11 View FIGURE 11 , 12 View FIGURE 12
Type material. Holotype ♂: CHINA: Chongqing City, Jinyun Mountain (29°50.43′N, 106°23.29′E, 777 m elev.), 16 Oct. 2011, leg. Luyu Wang. GoogleMaps
Paratypes: 3♂, same data as holotype GoogleMaps ; 1♂ 2♀, same location as holotype (29°50.43′N, 106°23.29′E, 777 m elev.), 24 Oct. 2017, leg. Yannan Mu GoogleMaps ; 3♂, same location as holotype, 25 Oct. 2017, leg. Yannan Mu GoogleMaps ; 4♀, same location as holotype, 23 Dec. 2012, leg. Dong Wang GoogleMaps ; 2♀, Chongqing City, Wanzhou District, Wang er Bao Natural Reserve (30°39.304′N, 108°44.020′E, 1296 m elev.), 15 Mar. 2013, leg. Xuankong Jiang. GoogleMaps
Etymology. This specific name is derived from the Latin word “triangularis”, referring to the triangle-shaped conductor; adjective.
Diagnosis. This new species resembles O. obesa Fu, Zhang & Zhang, 2016 by having a similar shaped bulb and RTA (compare Fig. 11B–C View FIGURE 11 and figs 5–6 in Fu et al. 2016), but the males can be distinguished by the long and strongly curved embolus (vs short and slightly curved, compare Figs 11C View FIGURE 11 , 12C View FIGURE 12 with figs 5, 10 in Fu et al. 2016), the females can be distinguished by the long connecting tube and the large spermathecae (vs short and small, respectively, compare Fig. 12E–F View FIGURE 12 with figs 12–13 in Fu et al. 2016).
Description. Male: total length 2.89–3.51 (n=8). Holotype ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ): total length 2.89, carapace 1.55 long, 1.27 wide (CW); abdomen 1.34 long, 0.84 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.09, ALE 0.09, PME 0.07, PLE 0.09; AME–AME 0.06, AME–ALE 0.02, ALE–ALE 0.27, PME–PME 0.12, PME–PLE 0.09, PLE–PLE 0.44, ALE–PLE 0.11. Eye area 0.54 wide (EAW), cephalic region 0.71 wide (CRW), EAW/CRW 0.76. CRW/CW 0.56. MOA 0.27 long, anterior width 0.22, posterior width 0.28. Clypeal height 0.11 ( CH), CH /AME 1.22.
Palp as in Figs 11A–D View FIGURE 11 , 12A–D View FIGURE 12 . FA strongly raised, located at middle part of femur. RTA flake-shaped, base wide, tapering off from base to tip ( Figs 11B View FIGURE 11 , 12B View FIGURE 12 ). TA short and thin, close to and behind embolus, with little spot at the end. Embolus thick, strongly curved, with scar at middle part ( Figs 11B–C View FIGURE 11 , 12B–C View FIGURE 12 ). Conductor short, translucent, triangular in ventral view ( Figs 11C View FIGURE 11 , 12C View FIGURE 12 ), distal end reaching base of embolus.
Female: one paratype ( Fig. 10B View FIGURE 10 ): total length 4.02, carapace 1.60 long, 1.36 wide (CW); abdomen 2.42 long, 1.81 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.09, ALE 0.09, PME 0.07, PLE 0.09; AME–AME 0.06, AME–ALE 0.02, ALE–ALE 0.28, PME–PME 0.13, PME–PLE 0.07, PLE–PLE 0.42, ALE – PLE 0.08. Eye area 0.52 wide (EAW), cephalic region 0.68 wide (CRW), EAW/CRW 0.76. CRW/CW 0.50 . MOA 0.24 long, anterior width 0.24, posterior width 0.29. Clypeal height 0.14 ( CH), CH / AME 1.56 .
Epigyne as in Figs 11E–F View FIGURE 11 , 12E–F View FIGURE 12 . Median septum thin and long, about one diameter of spermathecae ( Fig. 12E View FIGURE 12 ), with parallel edges. Copulatory openings large and oval, located at anterior of plate, separated by about 1.5 times the diameter of spermathecae. Copulatory ducts thick, bent into semicircle, connected with bursa. Glandular appendage short, digit-shaped. Bursa oval, large. Connecting tube long and thin, curved at anterior part, straight at end. Spermathecae oval, close to each other. Fertilization ducts located at anterior of spermathecae.
Measurements of legs:
Spination of legs:
Distribution. China (Chongqing City).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |