Micronephthys stammeri ( Augener, 1932 )

Ravara, Ascensão, Cunha, Marina R. & Pleijel, Fredrik, 2010, Nephtyidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) from southern Europe 2682, Zootaxa 2682 (1), pp. 1-68 : 27-30

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2682.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CC2B98CA-8CEB-4362-A018-031A4B27A725

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5311958

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CA4887EA-B766-9B4D-7997-059F1A0748D1

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Micronephthys stammeri ( Augener, 1932 )
status

 

Micronephthys stammeri ( Augener, 1932) View in CoL

Figures 7 View FIGURE 7 , 9 View FIGURE 9

Nephthys stammeri Augener, 1932: 678 View in CoL , fig. 2.

Nephthys inermis Augener 1932: 663 View in CoL .

Micronephthys stammeri Hartman 1950: 131 View in CoL ; Banse 1959: 302, fig. 6.

Micronephthys maryae View in CoL San Martín, 1982: figs. 1–3; Rainer and Kaly 1988: 696, figs. 5A–E and 6B; Laborda 2004: 416, fig. 152A–C.

Type locality. Adriatic Sea (Timavo-Geviet region) .

Material examined. Mediterranean Sea. Adriatic Sea, Croatia, Rovinj: 4 complete and 4 incomplete spms ( ZMH-V 12889); Istra, off Rovinj: RV Burin, 45º05.769’N, 13º37.406’E, 18 m, Sep 2008, 1 complete spm ( DBUA 01050). Spain, between Cabo San Antonio and Puerto de Valencia: 1 complete and 1 incomplete spms ( MNCN 16.01/2210 as M. maryae ); Mallorca Island, Santa Ponça: 1 complete spm ( MNCN 16.01/278, paratype of M. maryae ).

Pacific Ocean. Japan, Tanabe Bay : 33º42.772’N, 135º22.248’E, 10 m (?), Nov 2008, 4 complete and 1 incomplete spms ( DBUA 01051-01 View Materials ), and 1 incomplete spm ( MB36000144 ); Shirahama, 33º41.481’N, 135º20.181’E, 0.5 m, Nov 2008, 2 complete spms ( DBUA 01051-02 View Materials ). Marshall Islands, Parry Island (lagoon side), Enewetak atoll: 11º24’N, 162º23’E, 90 ft, summer 1957, 1 complete spm ( USNM 118681 About USNM as M. sphaerocirrata ) GoogleMaps .

Description. Examined specimens up to 6 mm long for up to 49 chaetigers. See Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 for length and width measurements. Body small, slightly wider anteriorly, tapering posteriorly. Poor dorsal delineation between anterior segments. Colour in ethanol white; chaetae and acicula amber. Two pairs of large coalescent eyes visible at level of chaetiger 3. Pharynx subdistal region with 20–22 rows of about 8 long and conical subterminal papillae decreasing in size towards base of pharynx, followed by several minute (wart-like) papillae, extending over 2/3 length of pharynx ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 ); proximal region smooth. Jaws conical ( Fig. 9B View FIGURE 9 ). Prostomium subpentagonal, anterior margin slightly convex; antennae and palps subequal in length, cirriform with swollen tips; palps inserted ventrolaterally on median region of prostomium ( Fig. 9C View FIGURE 9 ). Nuchal organs rounded. Parapodia biramous. Parapodia of chaetiger 1 similar in size to subsequent ones, anteriorly directed, parallel to prostomium; notopodial acicular lobes conical, pre- and postchaetal lamellae rudimentary; neuropodial pre- and postchaetal lamellae forming a cylinder covering acicular lobes; dorsal cirri small and sphaerical; ventral cirri cirriform with swollen tips, similar in size to palps. Following parapodia with conical acicular lobes; pre- and postchaetal lamellae of both rami rudimentary or poorly developed, rounded; dorsal and ventral cirri subsphaerical ( Fig. 9D View FIGURE 9 ). Branchiae absent. Chaetae of five kinds: barred chaetae, with a peak in center of each bar (slightly thicker than barred chaetae from other chaetigers) in preacicular position of notopodia of chaetiger 1 ( Fig. 9E View FIGURE 9 ); simple barred chaetae in preacicular position of following parapodia; finely spinulated chaetae in postacicular position of all parapodia ( Fig. 9F View FIGURE 9 ); lyriform chaetae with unequal rami and thin and long spines on the internal side, in postacicular position of parapodia from chaetiger 3 ( Fig. 9G View FIGURE 9 ), and capillary chaetae in the neuropodia of chaetiger 1. One acicula with curved tips per ramus ( Fig. 9H View FIGURE 9 ).

Remarks. The original description by Augener (1932) is incomplete and the holotype has been lost. Banse (1959) redescribed the species based on specimens also collected from the Adriatic Sea. Those specimens were examined within this study and Banse’s description is here emended and completed with the following features: dorsal cirri are present from chaetiger 1 (instead of chaetiger 2); special chaetae are present in the notopodia of first chaetiger; lyriform chaetae are present from the chaetiger 3 (instead of chaetiger 15). There are no records of this species after Banse (1959). In 1982, San Martín described a new species, M. maryae , for specimens collected in the Mediterranean Sea. However, he did not examined the type material of M. stammeri and based his conclusions on the description given by Banse (1959). Consequently, the differences used by San Martín to distinguish these two species are exactly the characters added here to the emended description of M. stammeri . Therefore we consider M. maryae to be a junior synonym of M. stammeri . Both the description of M. maryae by San Martin (1982) and the description of M. stammeri by Banse (1959) refer the presence of 20–22 rows of subterminal papillae in the pharynx. However, Rainer and Kaly (1988) emended the description of M. maryae to include 14 rows of subterminal papillae, instead of 20– 22, based on a paratype of M. maryae and on specimens from Australia. According to the specimens examined in this study, especially the ones from the Adriatic Sea, the pharynx actually has at least 20 rows of papillae. On the paratype of M. maryae and on the specimens from Japan the 20 rows of papillae were not possible to assess with certainty, although they seem to have more than 14 rows.

Apart from the differences mentioned above, M. stammeri clearly differs from the other two Micronephthys species in body size ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ). Micronephthys sphaerocirrata is a larger species in length and number of segments. As for M. minuta the scarce data do not allow a reliable conclusion, althought the specimens appear larger than M. stammeri for the same number of segments.

Distribution. Adriatic Sea; Mediterranean Sea (Balearic Islands); Indian Ocean (W Australia); Pacific Ocean ( Japan, Marshall Islands) ( San Martín 1982; Rainer & Kaly 1988; Laborda 2004).

Habitat. Median sand with gravel, 4–7 m depth ( Banse 1959; Laborda 2004).

DBUA

Zoological Collection of the Biology Department, University of the Azores

MNCN

Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Annelida

Class

Polychaeta

Order

Phyllodocida

Family

Nephtyidae

Genus

Micronephthys

Loc

Micronephthys stammeri ( Augener, 1932 )

Ravara, Ascensão, Cunha, Marina R. & Pleijel, Fredrik 2010
2010
Loc

Micronephthys maryae

Laborda, A. J. 2004: 416
Rainer, S. F. & Kaly, U. L. 1988: 696
1988
Loc

Micronephthys stammeri

Banse, K. 1959: 302
Hartman, O. 1950: 131
1950
Loc

Nephthys stammeri

Augener, H. 1932: 678
1932
Loc

Nephthys inermis

Augener, H. 1932: 663
1932
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF