Koenenites lamellosus (Sandberger & Sandberger, 1851)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.823.1811 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D5AC626B-4A10-4CD9-B77B-6D7EFE8D180E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6629207 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C9186647-421E-8942-FE79-5A60FA58C3C9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Koenenites lamellosus (Sandberger & Sandberger, 1851) |
status |
|
Koenenites lamellosus (Sandberger & Sandberger, 1851) View in CoL
Figs 16–18 View Fig View Fig View Fig
Goniatites lamellosus Sandberger & Sandberger, 1851: 88 , pl. 8 fig. 1, 1a–d.
? Goniatites Höninghausi View in CoL – von Buch 1832: 40, pl. 2 figs 3–4. — Bronn 1835: 107, pl. 1 fig. 1. Goniatites sublamellosus Sandberger & Sandberger 1851: 87 , pl. 2 fig. 2, 2a–c. Koenenites lamellosus View in CoL – Wedekind 1913: 42; 1918: 126. — Matern 1931: 74, pl. 2 fig. 7. — House 1978: 48, pl. 7 figs 3, 5. — Dzik 2002: text-figs 50a–e, 56c–h. — Korn & Klug 2002: 118, text-fig. 118a–b.
Koenenites sublamellosus View in CoL – Wedekind 1918: 126. — Matern 1931: 74. — Korn & Klug 2002: 118, text- fig. 118c.
non Koenenites lamellosus View in CoL – Petter 1959: 157, pl. 10 fig. 14, text-fig. 41a.
Diagnosis
Species of Koenenites reaching about 90 mm conch diameter with thickly discoidal, evolute conch at 5 mm dm (ww/dm ~ 0.50; uw/dm ~ 0.45); coiling rate moderate (WER ~ 1.85); with thinly discoidal, subinvolute conch at 20 mm dm (ww/dm ~ 0.40; uw/dm ~ 0.28); with extremely discoidal, subinvolute conch at 75 mm dm (ww/dm ~ 0.25; uw/dm ~ 0.23); coiling rate moderate at 5 mm dm (WER ~ 1.85) and very high above 30 mm dm (WER ~ 2.40). Whorl profile compressed (ww/wh ~ 0.50) in the adult stage; umbilical wall steep and rounded, venter rounded. Growth lines lamellar, strongly biconvex with very narrow, high ventrolateral projection. Suture line simple, with V-shaped external lobe, high median saddle, pointed asymmetrical prongs of the E lobe, slightly asymmetrically rounded lateral saddle and pointed L lobe.
Material examined
Lectotype GERMANY • Rhenish Mountains, Nanzenbach ; early Frasnian (Red Ironstone); Wiesb. 40a. Illustrated by Sandberger & Sandberger (1850 –1856: pl. 8 fig. 1) and Korn & Klug (2002: text-fig. 108a), reillustrated here in Fig. 16A View Fig .
Paralectotype GERMANY • Rhenish Mountains, Nanzenbach ; early Frasnian (Red Ironstone); Wiesb. 40b. Illustrated by Sandberger & Sandberger (1850 –1856: pl. 8 fig. 1a-c) and Korn & Klug (2002: text-fig. 108b), reillustrated here in Fig. 16D View Fig .
Additional material
GERMANY • 4 specimens; Rhenish Mountains , Oberscheld ( Grube Anna ); early Frasnian (Red Ironstone); Koch Coll.; MB.C.4306.1 , MB.C.34306.2 , MB.C.4306.3 , MB.C.22184 • 1 specimen; Rhenish Mountains , Oberscheld (Grube Königszug, 120 m-Sohle); early Frasnian (Red Ironstone); MB.C.22201 • 2 specimens; Rhenish Mountains , Oberscheld ( Grube Rinkenbach ); early Frasnian (Red Ironstone); Dannenberg Coll.; MB.C.22183 , MB.C.22189a–b • 1 specimen; Rhenish Mountains , Oberscheld (Sessacker); early Frasnian (Red Ironstone); Dannenberg Coll.; MB.C.30431 • 2 specimens; Rhenish Mountains , Oberscheld (Staatliche Grube); early Frasnian (Red Ironstone); Hubach 1913 Coll.; MB.C.4303.2 , MB.C.4303.3 .
Description
Eight specimens are selected for description and illustration:
Lectotype Wiesb. 40a: incomplete specimen with 65 mm conch diameter in haematitic ironstone ( Fig. 16A View Fig ).
Paratype Wiesb. 40b: incomplete specimen with about 50 mm conch diameter in haematitic ironstone ( Fig. 16D View Fig ).
MB.C.22184: incomplete specimen with 73 mm conch diameter in haematitic iron ore, the last whorl is partly crushed ( Fig. 17A View Fig ).
MB.C.22183: incomplete specimen with 53 mm conch diameter in haematitic ironstone ( Fig. 17B View Fig ).
MB.C.22201: sectioned specimen with 77 mm conch diameter in haematite ore ( Fig. 18A View Fig ).
MB.C.4306.1: well-preserved, complete steinkern specimen with 36 mm conch diameter in haematitic ironstone ( Fig. 17C View Fig ).
MB.C.4306.2: well-preserved, complete specimen with 25 mm conch diameter in haematitic ironstone, ornament perfectly preserved ( Fig. 17D View Fig ).
MB.C.4306.3: well-preserved, complete specimen with 20 mm conch diameter in haematitic ironstone, ornament perfectly preserved ( Fig. 17E View Fig ).
The three specimens MB.C.4306.1, MB.C.4306.2 and MB.C.4306.3 allow the study of conch proportions and ornament between 19 and 36 mm diameter ( Fig. 17 View Fig C-E). They are similar in shape with a weak ontogenetic trend towards a slenderer conch (ww/dm decreasing from 0.35 to 0.29). They show an oblique, broadly convex umbilical wall and flanks that converge slowly towards the narrowly rounded venter. The ornament shows lamellar growth lines, which in the two smaller specimens MB.C.4306.2 and MB.C.4306.3 are particularly well-preserved; they extend with a low dorsolateral projection, a deep and wide lateral sinus and a very narrow, very high linguiform ventrolateral projection across the flanks and then turn back to form a narrow, very deep ventral sinus.
The larger specimens MB.C.22183 (53 mm dm) and MB.C.22184 (73 mm dm) are thinly discoidal and subinvolute with a compressed whorl profile; the umbilical wall is steep and the flanks converge towards the narrowly rounded venter ( Fig. 17A–B View Fig ). The ornament shows biconvex growth lines,
which are fine on the inner flank and lamellar on the outer flank. They extend with a moderately high dorsolateral projection and a high and subangular ventrolateral projection. The external sinus is deep and semicircular. The suture line is partly visible in specimen MB.C.22184, showing a V-shaped lateral lobe on the inner flank ( Fig. 18B View Fig ).
The sectioned specimen MB.C.22201 ( Fig. 18A View Fig ) shows significant ontogenetic changes in the conch parameters: (1) the ww/dm ratio has a nearly monophasic ontogeny with a rather continuous decrease from 0.75 at 1 mm dm to = 0.25 at 77 mm dm. (2) The ww/wh ratio has a similar course (from 2.05 to 0.50) but with more accelerated decrease between 3 and 10 mm dm. (3) The uw/dm ratio is conspicuously biphasic with a juvenile increase from 0.35 to 0.45 at 5 mm dm and an adult decrease to 0.23. (4) The coiling rate is also biphasic, but not parallel to the uw/dm ratio; the WER shows a juvenile decrease
to 1.68 at 3.5 mm dm, followed by a decelerated increase with asymptotic approximation of a value of 2.40 at 30 mm dm ( Fig. 18C–F View Fig ). The ontogeny of the whorl profile is rather simple with a continuous transformation of a depressed shape into a compressed shape; the value falls below a value of 1.00. Above this diameter, the whorl profile has a steep umbilical wall, a broadly rounded umbilical margin, moderately strong converging flanks and a rounded venter.
Remarks
Matern (1931: 74, pl. 2 fig. 7) proposed a neotype from the Senckenberg Collection (specimen XI329a) and stated that the original specimen is missing. However, two syntypes figured by Sandberger & Sandberger (1850 –1856) are preserved (specimens 40a = old 62.11./W.15a and 40b = old 62.11./W.15b) in the Sandberger collection, which is stored at the Wiesbaden Museum. House (1978: 48, pl. 7 fig. 5) designated specimen 40a as the lectotype; it was illustrated by Sandberger & Sandberger (1850 –1856: pl. 8 fig. 1) and is re-illustrated here ( Fig. 16A View Fig ).
Sandberger & Sandberger (1850 –1856) described the two new species “ Goniatites sublamellosus ” and “ Goniatites lamellosus ”, which apparently are conspecific. Of these two, mostly “ G. lamellosus ” was refigured and is therefore here used as the valid species (despite the page priority of “ G. sublamellosus ”).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Koenenites lamellosus (Sandberger & Sandberger, 1851)
Korn, Dieter & Bockwinkel, Jürgen 2022 |
Petter G. 1959: 157 |
Koenenites sublamellosus
Korn & Klug 2002: 118 |
Matern 1931: 74 |
Wedekind 1918: 126 |
Goniatites Höninghausi
Dzik 2002: 35 |
Korn & Klug 2002: 118 |
Matern H. 1931: 74 |
Wedekind R. 1918: 126 |
Wedekind R. 1913: 42 |
Bronn H. G. 1835: 107 |
von Buch L. 1832: 40 |