Pseudoprobeloceras applanatum ( Wedekind, 1918 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.823.1811 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D5AC626B-4A10-4CD9-B77B-6D7EFE8D180E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6629193 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C9186647-420E-8955-FD9B-5832FD60C536 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pseudoprobeloceras applanatum ( Wedekind, 1918 ) |
status |
|
Pseudoprobeloceras applanatum ( Wedekind, 1918) View in CoL
Gephyroceras Pernai var. applanata Wedekind, 1918: 122 View in CoL , 167, pl. 21 fig. 3, text-fig. 28b.
Ponticeras pernai applanata – Matern 1931: 80. — House in House & Ziegler 1977: 79, pl. 1 figs 16– 17, 26–27.
Pseudoprobeloceras applanatum View in CoL – Korn & Klug 2002: 98.
Diagnosis
Species of Pseudoprobeloceras reaching about 50 mm conch diameter with thinly discoidal, subinvolute conch at 30 mm dm (ww/dm ~ 0.35; uw/dm ~ 0.28); coiling rate moderate (WER ~ 1.95). Whorl profile weakly compressed (ww/wh ~ 0.85); umbilical wall oblique, umbilical margin broadly rounded, venter weakly flattened, ventrolateral shoulder narrowly rounded. Growth lines very fine, strongly biconvex with linguiform ventrolateral projection. Suture line with V-shaped external lobe with diverging flanks; median saddle low, E 2 lobe small, rounded, ventrolateral saddle almost symmetrically rounded, lateral lobe asymmetrically rounded.
Material examined
Holotype GERMANY • Rhenish Mountains, Oberscheld ( Grube Prinzkessel ); late Givetian (Red Ironstone); Welsch 1912 Coll.; SMF.Mbg.2323 . Illustrated by Wedekind (1918: pl. 21 fig.3) and House & Ziegler (1977: pl. 1 figs 26–27); re-illustrated here in Fig. 4B View Fig .
Additional material
GERMANY • 1 specimen; Rhenish Mountains , Oberscheld (Grube Volpertseiche); late Givetian (Red Ironstone); Koch Coll.; MB.C.22157 .
Description
Two specimens are selected for description and illustration:
Holotype SMF.Mbg.2323: rather well-preserved specimen with 24 mm diameter in haematitic limestone ( Fig. 4B View Fig ).
MB.C.22157: incomplete specimen with about 44 mm diameter in haematitic limestone; more than half of the last volution belong to the body chamber ( Fig. 7A View Fig ).
Holotype SMF.Mbg.2323 with 24 mm diameter is discoidal and subinvolute ( Fig. 4B View Fig ). Its umbilical wall is rounded; the flanks slightly flattened and converge to the rather broad venter. A pronounced, weakly angular ventrolateral shoulder is present on the entire last volution. The growth lines are lamellar; there are faint riblets around the umbilicus. The suture line has a large, subdivided external lobe with very small E 1 prongs, a low median saddle and a very deep E m lobe.
Specimen MB.C.22157, 35 mm in diameter, has a thinly discoidal and subinvolute conch with a compressed whorl profile ( Fig. 7A View Fig ). It is widest near the mid-flank and has an oblique umbilical wall and broadly rounded umbilical margin; the flanks are convex and weakly convergent, the outer flanks are weakly concave and separated from the weakly flattened venter by a narrowly rounded ventrolateral shoulder. The shell remains show rhythmically strengthened growth lines with broadly rounded dorsolateral projection, a wide lateral sinus and a narrow and high, lingulate ventrolateral projection. The suture line is barely visible in the ventral portion because of poor preservation; it possesses a V-shaped external lobe, a narrowly rounded ventrolateral saddle and a broadly rounded lateral lobe ( Fig. 7B View Fig ).
Remarks
Pseudoprobeloceras applanatum differs in the slightly stouter conch shape (ww/dm ~ 0.35) from P. pernai (ww/dm = 0.20–0.30) and the narrower umbilicus (uw/dm ~ 0.28 in contrast to ~ 0.33). The main distinguishing character to separate P. applanatum from P. pernai is the shape of the venter; while this is rounded in P. pernai , in P. applanatum it is slightly flattened and bordered by a narrowly rounded ventrolateral shoulder from the flanks.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudoprobeloceras applanatum ( Wedekind, 1918 )
Korn, Dieter & Bockwinkel, Jürgen 2022 |
Pseudoprobeloceras applanatum
Korn D. & Klug C. 2002: 98 |
Ponticeras pernai applanata
House M. R. & Ziegler W. 1977: 79 |
Matern H. 1931: 80 |
Gephyroceras Pernai var. applanata
Wedekind R. 1918: 122 |