Dichotomius (Cephagonus) spadiceus (Luederwaldt)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2019.1692088 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3671873 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C740D609-2A06-BB21-FF18-E15FE7912A9C |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Dichotomius (Cephagonus) spadiceus (Luederwaldt) |
status |
|
Group 5: Dichotomius (Cephagonus) spadiceus (Luederwaldt) View in CoL species-group
Diagnosis. species of this group are separated of other Cephagonus by the combination of following characters: posterior angle of pronotum excavated and bearing groups of 5 ocellate punctures; clypeo-genal angle obtuse (as on D. fissus and D. ascanius groups); larger males pronotal disc with central emargination at anterior portion (as D. socius ) ( Figure 43 View Figure 43 (aıf)); males pronotal anterior excavation and declivity smoothı lacking coarseı ocellate punctures or striations; elytra striae flatı weakly impressed (as D. fissus group); females sixth abdominal ventrite posterior margin with a central emargination producing two triangular projections advancing beneath pydigium margin (like on D. (s.) fissus ) and female sixth ventrite disc with fine puncture medially (viewed under 20x magnification) and having a pair of triangular projections advancing beneath the pygidium margin ( Figure 9 View Figure 9 (b)). Species of D. spadiceus group are similar to D. fissus and D. socius ( ascanius group)ı maybe because of their elytral striae and pronotum anterior emargination. Howeverı they are smaller (maximum BL = 15 mmı PW = 9 mm)ı lack coarse or ocellate punctures on the pronotal anterior portion. Other important difference among these species is the shape of female sixth ventriteı which is less wide on spadiceus species group than it is on fissus group.
Representatives. 5.1: D. spadiceus ; 5.2: D. itatiaiaensis ; 5.3: D. lucianomourai .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |