Mesoleberis, Kornicker, Louis S., Van, Barry W. M., Bakel, Fraaije, René H. B. & Jagt, John W. M., 2006
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.172935 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5661477 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C616879A-4B7E-C069-FE94-FEAB1129FB40 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mesoleberis |
status |
gen. nov. |
Mesoleberis View in CoL new genus
Type Species. Mesoleberis hollandica new species, by monotypy.
Diagnosis
Carapace oval in lateral view with rostrum and incisure. Central adductor muscle scars composed of cluster of numerous radiating short scars. Linear indentation extends from point posterior to incisure to ventral margin.
Range
Upper Cretaceous, upper Maastrichtian ( Belemnitella junior and Belemnella (Neobelelemnella) kazimiroviensis cephalopod zones).
Comparisons
Lack of soft parts and appendages is a selfevident handicap in the taxonomic placement of fossil ostracodes. In the rare find of a fossil ostracode bearing appendages, the carapace may be poorly preserved, as in Juraleberis jubata (see below). The carapace of Mesoleberis differs from those Mesozoic myodocopids in which the carapace is known in its oval shape, its indented incisure, its radiating central adductor muscle scars, and in having a line posterior to the incisure. Lack of appendages does not permit close comparison with Recent species, but the present specimens are larger than those in known genera of extant Cyclasteropinae . They are also much larger than specimens of Eocypridina radiata ( Jones & Kirkby 1874) from the Permian of Greece, identified and illustrated by Kornicker & Sohn (2000: fig. 21a, d).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |