Bembidion roosevelti Pic, 1902
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C37A3A90-DBFF-3E14-033F-8DD725924115 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Bembidion roosevelti Pic, 1902 |
status |
|
Bembidion roosevelti Pic, 1902
Bembidium concinnum Blaisdell, 1902: 78 [secondary homonym of Bembidion concinnum (Stephens, 1828)]. Type locality: "Eldorado County, Cal[ifornia]" (original citation). Syntype(s) in CAS [# 2665].
Bembidium roosevelti Pic, 1902: 71. Replacement name for Bembidium concinnum Blaisdell, 1902. Note. The spelling roosvelti used by some authors, including Lindroth (1963b: 392), is an incorrect subsequent spelling that I consider not to be in prevailing usage. Pic (1902: 71) did not give the etymology of the specific name.
Bembidium perconcinnum Blaisdell, 1904: 349. Replacement name for Bembidium concinnum Blaisdell, 1902.
Bembidion blaisdelli Casey, 1918: 222. Replacement name for Bembidion concinnum Blaisdell, 1902.
Distribution.
This species is found from the southern part of the Prairie Provinces (Lindroth 1963b: 393) to eastern Oregon (Baker County, CNC), south to Riverside County in southern California (Dajoz 2007: 19), central Nevada (Lander County, CNC), central Utah (Sevier County, CNC), southern Wyoming (Lindroth 1963b: 393), and southwestern North Dakota (Bowman County, CNC).
Records.
CAN: AB, MB, SK USA: CA, ID, MT, ND, NV, OR, UT, WY
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Bembidion roosevelti Pic, 1902
Bousquet, Yves 2012 |
Bembidion blaisdelli
Casey 1918 |
Bembidium concinnum
Stephens 1828 |
Bembidium concinnum
Stephens 1828 |
Bembidium concinnum
Stephens 1828 |