Ceraphron longumerunus, Salden & Peters, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.884.2181 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A128228C-185E-4D21-B23B-223C7C737C4C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8193773 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/194318FF-36D8-4CB7-ADE6-AD12C18409BD |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:194318FF-36D8-4CB7-ADE6-AD12C18409BD |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ceraphron longumerunus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ceraphron longumerunus sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:194318FF-36D8-4CB7-ADE6-AD12C18409BD
Fig. 66 View Fig
Diagnosis
Mesosoma yellowish except meso- and metapleuron darker, metasoma light brown-yellowish except anterior third lighter; scape shorter than F1 and F2 combined, F1 4.8× as long as wide, F1 3.8× as long as pedicel, F1 slightly shorter than F7 and F8 combined, F1 longer than F9; few distinctly small multiporous plates on flagellomeres; head width 1.09–1.29× (1.29) mesosoma width; mesoscutum width 1.32–1.68 × (1.32) mesoscutellum width; posterior mesoscutal width 1.26–1.32 × (1.32) mesoscutellum width; mesoscutellum length 1.17–1.21× (1.21) posterior mesoscutal width; anteromedian projection of the metanoto-propodeo-metapecto-mesopectal complex dorsally oriented in lateral view with pointed and bifurcated end. Male genitalia: harpe bulb-shaped in ventral and dorsal view; harpe/gvc index 0.34; dorsomedial margins of harpes indistinct at distodorsal margin of gvc, dorsomedial margin of harpe indistinct in basal third, concave in middle third, convex in apical third, apex of harpe rounded; ventral area of gvc convex with indistinct distal setae; longest lateral seta as long as harpe, longest apical setae 2.5 × as long as harpe; gvc width 1.44 × distal gvc width; aedeagus + gonossiculus with at least two distinct digital teeth, oriented dorsally.
Etymology
The species name is a composition of the word long, the flagellomere and the Latin word ‘ unus ’, which means ‘one’, with reference to the elongate F1.
Material examined
Holotype
KENYA • ♂; Western Province, Kakamega Forest; 00°12′42.6 N, 34°55′52.3 E; 1615 m a.s.l.; 16 Aug. 2007; F. Hita Garcia leg.; Transect 20; primary rain forest; Winkler leaf litter extraction; ZFMK; ZFMK- HYM-00036940 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes
KENYA – Western Province • 2 ♂♂; Kakamega Forest; 00°21′4.9 N, 34°51′41.1 E; 1602 m a.s.l.; no date on label, 2007 or 2008; F. Hita Garcia leg.; Transect 1; primary rain forest; Winkler leaf litter extraction; NHMUK; NHMUK-013389018 , GoogleMaps NHMUK-013389019 GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding; ZFMK; ZFMK-HYM-00034462 , GoogleMaps ZFMK-HYM-00034472 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Kakamega Forest; 00°19′36 N, 34°52′14.6 E; 1570 m a.s.l.; 21 Jun. 2007; F. Hita Garcia leg.; Transect 6; primary rain forest; Winkler leaf litter extraction; SMNS; SMNS-HYM-T00789 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Kakamega Forest; 00°19′36 N, 34°52′14.6 E; 1570 m a.s.l.; 28 Jun. 2007; F. Hita Garcia leg.; Transect 6; primary rain forest; Winkler leaf litter extraction; SMNS; SMNS-HYM-T00790 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Kakamega Forest; 00°21′7.9 N, 34°52′2.6 E; 1597 m a.s.l.; 2 Jul. 2007; F. Hita Garcia leg.; Transect 7; primary rain forest; Winkler leaf litter extraction; NMK; NMK ( ZFMK-HYM-00034467 ) GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Kakamega Forest; 00°27′0.9 N, 34°50′52.9 E; 1649 m a.s.l.; 10 Jul. 2007; F. Hita Garcia leg.; Transect 8; primary rain forest; Winkler leaf litter extraction; NMK; NMK ( ZFMK-HYM-00034468 ) GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Kakamega Forest; 00°14′20.5 N, 34°51′52.8 E; 1634 m a.s.l.; 4 Aug. 2007; F. Hita Garcia leg.; Transect 17; primary rain forest; Winkler leaf litter extraction; ZFMK; ZFMK- HYM-00034469 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Kakamega Forest; 00°14′20.5 N, 34°51′52.8 E; 1634 m a.s.l.; 10 Aug. 2007; F. Hita Garcia leg.; Transect 17; primary rain forest; Winkler leaf litter extraction; ZFMK; ZFMK- HYM-00034470 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; Kakamega Forest; 00°14′52.3 N, 34°52′5.3 E; 1607 m a.s.l.; 21 Aug. 2007; F. Hita Garcia leg.; Transect 18; primary rain forest; Winkler leaf litter extraction; ZFMK; ZFMK- HYM-00034471 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (N = 3 in morphometric measurements)
BODY LENGTH. 0.76–0.91 mm (0.88 mm).
COLOUR. Head light brown-yellowish, mesosoma yellowish except meso- and metapleuron darker, metasoma light brown-yellowish except anterior one third lighter; scape and pedicel yellowish, F1 yellowish, F2 to F9 light brown except F2 lighter; legs yellowish except metacoxa light yellow and transparent; fore wing venation light brown, distal end of marginal vein and pterostigma marginal vein distinctly darker, fore and hind wing disc slightly melanized, fore wing at proximal part and at proximal half of stigmal vein less melanized.
ANTENNA. 11-segmented, flagellomeres cylindric; scape 4.5 × as long as pedicel, scape shorter than F1 and F2 combined, F1 4.8 × as long as wide, F1 3.8× as long as pedicel, F1 1.6× as long as F2, F1 slightly shorter than F7 and F8 combined, F1 longer than F9, F6 2.3 × as long as wide, F6 shorter than F7 and F8 combined, F6 1.3 × as high as F9; few distinctly small multiporous plates on flagellomeres, sensillae on flagellomeres sickle-shaped and longer than width of F1 to F4.
HEAD. Head width 1.18–1.30 × (1.18) head height; head width 1.86–1.96 × (1.88) interorbital space; maximum eye diameter 1.11–1.39 × (1.32) minimum eye diameter; head height 1.50–1.60 × (1.52) maximum eye diameter. Dorsal margin of occipital carina ventral to dorsal margin of lateral ocellus in lateral view; preoccipital furrow present; preoccipital carina indistinct. OOL:POL:LOL 1.00:0.37– 0.44:0.42–0.56 (1.00:0.44:0.56); OOL 2.13–3.17 × (2.25) lateral ocellus diameter. White, thick setae on upper face absent; supraclypeal depression present; lateral margin of torulus raised; intertorular carina present; posterolateral processes of gena absent.
MESOSOMA, METASOMA. Mesosoma not compressed laterally. Head width 1.09–1.29× (1.29) mesosoma width; Weber length 263–294 µm (294 µm). Mesoscutum densely setose, setae curved backwards; median mesoscutal sulcus present; median mesoscutal sulcus adjacent to transscutal articulation; interaxillar sulcus present (= scutoscutellar sulcus not adjacent to transscutal articulation), scutoscutellar sulcus straight; dorsal axillar area setose, setae curved backwards; mesoscutellum setose, setae curved backwards or straight. Mesoscutum width 1.32–1.68× (1.32) mesoscutellum width; posterior mesoscutal width 1.26–1.32 × (1.32) mesoscutellum width; mesoscutellum length 1.47–1.59× (1.59) mesoscutellum width; mesoscutellum length 1.17–1.21 × (1.21) posterior mesoscutal width; Weber length 1.27–1.62 × (1.62) mesoscutum width; Weber length 1.34–1.50× (1.34) mesoscutellum length. Anteromedian projection of the metanoto-propodeo-metapecto-mesopectal complex dorsally oriented in lateral view with pointed and bifurcated end; mesometapleural sulcus absent; posterior propodeal projection straight and light in ventrolateral view; posterior mesosomal comb absent. Basal transverse carina of petiole (on syntergum) present; at least five basal longitudinal carinae on syntergum; translucent patches on metasoma absent.
FORE WING. Length 2.98–3.10 × (3.02) width; stigmal vein 3× as long as pterostigma marginal length.
MALE GENITALIA. Genital length 86–113 µm (113 µm); Weber length 2.61–3.05 × (2.61) genital length; gvc width 59–63 µm (63 µm); genital length 1.38–1.80× (1.80) gvc width; gvc width three quarters of gvc length; gvc width 1.44× distal gvc width. Proximodorsal margin of gvc convex; distodorsal margin of gvc descending proximomedially ( Fig. 66C View Fig ); proximoventral margin of gvc concave; distoventral margin of gvc descending proximomedially ( Fig. 66A View Fig ); ventral area of gvc convex with indistinct distal setae; dorsal area of gvc straight ( Fig. 66B View Fig ); proximolateral margin of gvc ascending ventrally; distolateral margin of gvc descending ventrally ( Fig. 66B View Fig ). Harpe bulb-shaped in ventral and dorsal view; harpe/gvc index 0.34; lateral articulation site of harpe with gvc not flush ( Fig. 66A, C View Fig ); ventral margin of harpe straight, dorsal margin slightly concave ( Fig. 66B View Fig ), lateral margin straight and emarginated at apical third, widest point of harpe at lateral articulation site with gvc ( Fig. 66A, C View Fig ); dorsomedial margins of harpes indistinct at distodorsal margin of gvc, dorsomedial margin of harpe indistinct in basal third, concave in middle third, convex in apical third ( Fig. 66C View Fig ), apex of harpe rounded ( Fig. 66A, C View Fig ). Harpe with at least one lateral seta restricted to apical third, longest lateral seta as long as harpe, lateral seta oriented distolaterally and distoventrally; harpe with at least three apical setae, longest apical setae 2.5 × as long as harpe, apical setae oriented distolaterally, distomedially and distoventrally; harpe with at least three median setae restricted to apical third, longest median setae more than one third as long as harpe, median setae oriented distomedially and distoventrally. Aedeagus + gonossiculus more than two thirds as long as harpe, apex of aedeagus + gonossiculus acute ( Fig. 66A, C View Fig ) and dorsal to apex of of harpe. Aedeagus + gonossiculus with at least two distinct digital teeth, oriented dorsally. Genitalia weakly sclerotized with strongest sclerotization at aedeagus + gonossiculus.
Female
Unknown.
Variation
Longest apical setae are as long as the harpe in ZFMK-HYM-00034462 (apical setae might be broken). The digital teeth of the aedeagus + gonossiculus are indistinct in NHMUK-013389019 and ZFMK- HYM-00034472. The sensillae of the flagellomeres are longer than the width of all flagellomeres in ZFMK-HYM-00034471.
Biology
Host unknown, specimens collected from leaf litter.
Distribution
Afrotropical: Kenya.
Remarks
Comparison with similar species
The colouration pattern of Ceraphron longumerunus sp. nov. is somewhat similar to that of Ceraphron cingulum sp. nov., Cyoceraphron invisibilis sp. nov. and Cyoceraphron njano sp. nov. However, by many body and male genitalia characters C. longumerunus can be easily distinguished from all other treated species.
Condition of type material
In the holotype, the left F9, the left mesotarsus and the last two left protarsal segments are missing. The posterior end of the metasoma is slightly deformed, thus the body length measurement is not precise.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |