Cyoceraphron dhahabudorsalis, Salden & Peters, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.884.2181 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A128228C-185E-4D21-B23B-223C7C737C4C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8193956 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DC8B80CE-EB00-4DF7-9737-114BF66116E1 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:DC8B80CE-EB00-4DF7-9737-114BF66116E1 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cyoceraphron dhahabudorsalis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cyoceraphron dhahabudorsalis sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:DC8B80CE-EB00-4DF7-9737-114BF66116E1
Fig. 91 View Fig
Diagnosis
F1 1.3× as long as wide, F1 as long as pedicel, F1 distinctly shorter than F9; head width 1.07–1.23 × (1.07) head height; head width 1.96–2.09× (1.96) interorbital space; head height 1.48–1.57× (1.57) maximum eye diameter; mesosoma slightly compressed laterally; mesoscutellum length 1.30–1.55 × (1.30) mesoscutellum width; distinct pair of translucent patches on metasomal synsternum. Male genitalia: harpe cone-shaped in ventral and dorsal view; harpe/gvc index 0.60; dorsomedial margins of harpes not touching at distodorsal margin of gvc, dorsomedial margin of harpe straight and slightly diverging distolaterally from base to apex, apex of harpe pointed; harpe with at least two lateral setae restricted to apical quarter, longest lateral setae one third as long as harpe; harpe with at least three median setae restricted to apical quarter.
Etymology
The species name is derived from the Swahili word ‘ dhahabu ’ which means ‘gold’, and the anatomical term ‘dorsal’, with reference to the dorsally golden-yellowish mesosoma.
Material examined
Holotype
KENYA • ♂; Western Province, Kakamega Forest; 00°21′7.9 N, 34°52′2.6 E; 1597 m a.s.l.; 9 Jul. 2007; F. Hita Garcia leg.; Transect 7; primary rain forest; Winkler leaf litter extraction; ZFMK; ZFMK- HYM-00036977 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes
KENYA – Western Province • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; 2 Jul. 2007; ZFMK- HYM-00036978 GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂; Kakamega Forest; 00°14′52.3 N, 34°52′5.3 E; 1607 m a.s.l.; 14 Aug. 2007; F. Hita Garcia leg.; Transect 18; primary rain forest; Winkler leaf litter extraction; ZFMK; ZFMK- HYM-00036979 , GoogleMaps ZFMK-HYM-00036985 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; 21 Aug. 2007; ZFMK-HYM-00036986 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (N = 3 in morphometric measurements)
BODY LENGTH. 0.82–1.00 mm (1.00 mm).
COLOUR. Head dark brown, mesosoma dorsally golden-yellowish and ventrolaterally dark brown, metasoma light brown-yellowish; scape and pedicel yellowish, flagellum light brown, gradually darkening from F1 to F9; legs yellowish except proximal half of mesocoxa light brown, proximal third of metacoxa light brown; fore wing venation light brown, fore and hind wing disc slightly melanized.
ANTENNA. 11-segmented, flagellomeres cylindric; scape 3.5× as long as pedicel, scape longer than F1 and F2 combined, F1 1.3× as long as wide, F1 as long as pedicel, F1 1.1× as long as F2, F1 shorter than F7 and F8 combined, F1 distinctly shorter than F9, F6 1.1× as long as wide, F6 shorter than F7 and F8 combined, F6 1.1× as high as F9; few small multiporous plates on flagellomeres, sensillae on flagellomeres sickle-shaped and shorter than width of flagellomeres.
HEAD. Head width 1.07–1.23 × (1.07) head height; head width 1.96–2.09 × (1.96) interorbital space; maximum eye diameter 1.24–1.47 × (1.33) minimum eye diameter; head height 1.48–1.57 × (1.57) maximum eye diameter. Dorsal margin of occipital carina ventral to dorsal margin of lateral ocellus in lateral view; preoccipital furrow present; preoccipital carina present. OOL:POL:LOL 1.00:0.56– 0.60:0.53–0.56 (1.00:0.56:0.56); OOL 1.88–3.00 × (3.00) lateral ocellus size. White, thick setae on upper face absent; supraclypeal depression present; lateral margin of torulus slightly raised; intertorular carina present; posterolateral processes of gena absent.
MESOSOMA, METASOMA. Mesosoma slightly compressed laterally. Head width 1.05–1.09 × (1.09) mesosoma width; Weber length 294–306 µm (306 µm). Mesoscutum densely setose, setae curved backwards; median mesoscutal sulcus present; median mesoscutal sulcus adjacent to transscutal articulation; interaxillar sulcus present (= scutoscutellar sulcus not adjacent to transscutal articulation), scutoscutellar sulcus concave; dorsal axillar area setose, setae curved backwards; mesoscutellum setose, setae curved backwards. Mesoscutum width 1.74–1.91 × (1.74) mesoscutellum width; posterior mesoscutal width 1.35–1.40× (1.35) mesoscutellum width; mesoscutellum length 1.30–1.55× (1.30) mesoscutellum width; mesoscutellum length 0.97–1.11 × (0.97) posterior mesoscutal width; Weber length 1.07–1.27 × (1.23) mesoscutum width; Weber length 1.47–1.63 × (1.63) mesoscutellum length. Anteromedian projection of the metanoto-propodeo-metapecto-mesopectal complex curved in lateral view with blunt and lighter end, exceeding end of mesosoma; mesometapleural sulcus absent; posterior propodeal projection distinctly short and light in ventrolateral view; posterior mesosomal comb absent. Basal transverse carina of petiole (on syntergum) present; at least seven distinct, basal longitudinal carinae on syntergum; distinct pair of translucent patches on metasomal synsternum.
FORE WING. Length 3.03–3.23 × (3.10) width; stigmal vein shorter than 3 × pterostigma marginal length.
MALE GENITALIA. Genital length 100–106 µm (106 µm); Weber length 2.88–2.94 × (2.94) genital length; gvc width 44–50 µm (50 µm); genital length 2.00–2.29× (2.13) gvc width; gvc width more than three quarters of gvc length; gvc width 1.18 × distal gvc width. Proximodorsal margin of gvc straight; distodorsal margin of gvc slightly descending proximomedially ( Fig. 91C View Fig ); proximoventral margin of gvc slightly convex; distoventral margin of gvc descending proximomedially ( Fig. 91A View Fig ); ventral area of gvc slightly convex; dorsal area of gvc straight ( Fig. 91B View Fig ), indented distomedially; proximolateral margin of gvc emarginated ventrally; distolateral margin of gvc descending ventrally ( Fig. 91B View Fig ). Harpe cone-shaped in ventral and dorsal view; harpe/gvc index 0.60; lateral articulation site of harpe with gvc not flush ( Fig. 91A, C View Fig ); ventral margin of harpe concave, dorsal margin convex ( Fig. 91B View Fig ), lateral margin convex, widest point of harpe at basal third ( Fig. 91A, C View Fig ); dorsomedial margins of harpes not touching at distodorsal margin of gvc, dorsomedial margin of harpe straight and slightly diverging distolaterally from base to apex ( Fig. 91C View Fig ), apex of harpe pointed ( Fig. 91A, C View Fig ). Harpe with at least two lateral setae restricted to apical quarter, longest lateral setae one third as long as harpe, lateral setae oriented distolaterally and distoventrally; harpe with at least two apical setae, longest apical setae one quarter as long as harpe, apical setae oriented distolaterally, distomedially and distoventrally; harpe with at least three median setae restricted to apical quarter, longest median setae less than one quarter as long as harpe, median setae oriented distomedially and distoventrally. Aedeagus + gonossiculus three quarters as long as harpe, apex of aedeagus + gonossiculus broad ( Fig. 91A, C View Fig ) and dorsal to apex of harpe. Genitalia weakly sclerotized, almost transparent.
Female
Unknown.
Variation
Unknown.
Biology
Host unknown, specimens collected from leaf litter.
Distribution
Afrotropical: Kenya.
Remarks
Comparison with similar species
Cyoceraphron dhahabudorsalis sp. nov. differs from the generally similarly coloured C. fuscopleuralis Dessart, 1978 by the reduced posterior mesosomal comb (distinct in C. fuscopleuralis ), distinctly shorter antennal segments, and the laterally less compressed mesosoma.
For more comparisons with similar species, see remarks under C. harpe sp. nov.
Condition of type material
In the holotype, the left F9, the left middle leg, and the right fore leg are missing (except coxae).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |