Dermolepida lixi ( Nonfried, 1894 ), 1941
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4885.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2E69687C-74B4-4087-9BF6-039F5FE14A9E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4340905 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C264702F-4533-3517-2BE7-9A2BFA8BF847 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dermolepida lixi ( Nonfried, 1894 ) |
status |
|
Dermolepida lixi ( Nonfried, 1894)
Lepidioderma lixi Nonfried, 1894: 10 .
Dermolepida lixi: Arrow 1941: 448 .
Lepidioderma glaber Brenske, 1895: 42 .
Dermolepida glaber: Arrow 1941: 448 ; Britton 1957: 57 (synonymy).
Lectotype of Lepidioderma lixi (here designated) ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8–16 ): Coll. Nonfried. Nova Guinea (black bordered, typeset) | Lepidioderma Lixi Type Nfr (handwritten) | my lectotype label; in ZMB.
Paralectotype ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 8–16 ): Coll. Nonfried. Nova Guinea (black bordered, typeset) | my paralectotype label; in ZMB .
Nonfried (1894) did not define the type series, seeing an unknown number of specimens of unstated gender (vide Articles 73.1.2, 72.1.1). Britton (1957) apparently did not see any types and did not define their status. Britton (1978) referred to a holotype from Cornwallis Island [Dauan, Torres Strait] but did not indicate a collection; this cannot be a paralectotype as it does not come from Nonfried’s type locality of Neu-Guinea. Houston & Weir (1992) followed this status and said that the specimen was in NHML, but in December 2019 I could find no such specimen in NHML. As Britton (1978) and Houston & Weir (1992) provided no discussion, referred to a specimen not from the type locality and did not label any specimen in NHML or ZMB, neither mention of a holotype constitutes a valid lectotype designation (vide Article 74.5). To stabilise nomenclature, I designate the specimen in ZMB with Nonfried’s label the lectotype. A second species in ZMB with the same collection label I designate as a paralectotype.
Lectotype of Lepidioderma glaber (here designated) ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 8–16 ): glabra [sic] Brsk. (handwritten by Moser ) | ♂ 5 gl. Fühlerkeule [antennal club with five antennomeres] ♀ 4 gl. [antennal club with four antennomeres] Klauen [claws] [remainder illegible] (handwritten) | Cornwallis Islands. [Dauan Island, 9.41°S, 142.54°E] D Heyne (handwritten) | Coll Brenske (black bordered, typeset) | my lectotype label; in ZMB. GoogleMaps
Paralectotype ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 8–16 ): Cornwallis Islands . [Dauan Island, 9.41°S, 142.54°E] D Heyne (handwritten) | Coll Brenske (black bordered, typeset) | my paralectotype label; in ZMB GoogleMaps .
Brenske (1895) did not define the type series, seeing an unknown number of specimens of unstated gender (vide Articles 73.1.2, 72.1.1). Britton (1978) referred to a “ holotype ” from an unknown location, and Houston & Weir (1992) followed this. As Britton (1978) and Houston & Weir (1992) provided no discussion, referred to a specimen not from the type locality and did not label any specimen in ZMB, neither mention of a holotype constitutes a valid lectotype designation (vide Article 74.5). To stabilise nomenclature, I designate the specimen in ZMB with the “ glaber ” label the lectotype. A second species in ZMB with the same collection label I designate as a paralectotype. Neither have any handwritten identification/type labels by Brenske but they are undoubtably syntypes.
ZMB |
Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (Zoological Collections) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dermolepida lixi ( Nonfried, 1894 )
Allsopp, Peter G. 2020 |
Dermolepida lixi: Arrow 1941: 448
Arrow, G. J. 1941: 448 |
Dermolepida glaber:
Britton, E. B. 1957: 57 |
Arrow, G. J. 1941: 448 |
Lepidioderma glaber
Brenske, E. 1895: 42 |
Lepidioderma lixi
Nonfried, A. F. 1894: 10 |