Pherolepis aenescens ( Reuter, 1901 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.191187 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5661892 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C2118781-FFB3-7603-3BC3-105EE157D936 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pherolepis aenescens ( Reuter, 1901 ) |
status |
|
Pherolepis aenescens ( Reuter, 1901) View in CoL
( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 11 , 12–21 View FIGURES 12 – 15 View FIGURES 16 – 21 )
Neocoris aenescens Reuter, 1901:188 View in CoL .
Monosynamma aenescens Cavalho, 1958: 75 View in CoL . Pherolepis atrans: Kulik, 1968: 140 View in CoL .
Hypseloecus aenescens Kerzhner, 1970: 639, 1988:115 View in CoL . Pherolepis aenescens Schuh, 1989: 4, 1995: 457 View in CoL .
Specimens examined: CHINA: Nei Mongol Autonomous Region: 2 males, Zhenglan Banner (42°13'N, 116°00'E), 23.VII. 2005, alt. 1300m, Xu Zhang and Xiao-ming Li leg.. Beijing: 1 male, Xishan Mountain (39°55'N, 116°24'E), 28. V. 1957, Song-he Ying and Shao-hua Li leg.; 1 male, same data as above, 12. VII. 1957. Heilongjiang Province: 1male, Ningan City (44°21'N, 129°28'E), 7. VII. 2003, Xin Yu leg.; 1 female, Jiamusi City (46°47'N, 130°22'E), 1. VIII. 1984. Henan Province: 1 female, Anyang City (36°06'N, 114°21'E), 3. VIII. 1995. Gansu Province: 1 male, Pingliang City (35°32'N, 106°40'E), 29. VII. 1992, Guoqing Liu leg.. Hui Autonomous Region of Ningxia: 1 male, Jingyuan County (35°29'N, 106°19'E), 27. VII. 1992, Guo-qing Liu leg..
Diagnosis: Recognized by the brown, castaneous to almost black body ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 11 ), recumbent and suberect simple setae on the lateral surface of the head ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 12 – 15 ), the smooth, polished and shining pronotum with hardly visible, short, appressed simple setae, the almost black pronotum, the brown propleuron, the flattened scutellum covered with dense, appressed, lanceolate, scalelike setae laterally and apically, the same type of setae on proximal half of the hemelytron ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 12 – 15 ), and the form of male genitalia ( Figs. 16–21 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ). Easily distinguished from its congeners by the particular pattern of scalelike setae arranged on proximal half of the hemelytron ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 11 , 13 View FIGURES 12 – 15 ), as well as by the unique form of vesica ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ) and left paramere ( Figs. 17, 18 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ).
Redescription: Male ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 11 ): Macropterous, oval, broad, medium-sized.
Coloration: General coloration of dorsum brown-castaneous to almost black; vertex, frons and clypeus black; mandibular and maxillary plates reddish brown; buccula deep brown; labium deep brown with segment I and II relatively reddish; antennal segment I brown, segment II reddish brown, segment III and IV uniformly castaneous; pronotum, mesoscutum exposed, scutellum and mesepisternum black; hemelytron yellow-brown, cuneus deep castaneous with lateral margin red-brown; coxae dirty yellow, femora deep brown with basal margin yellowish, tibiae yellow-brown, tarsal segment I and II pale-yellow with segment III black; abdominen deep brown with central margin black.
Surface and vestiture: Vertex, frons and pronotum with appressed, irregularly scattered simple setae; hemelytron with two types of setae: appressed, flattened scalelike setae and relatively short, declined simple setae; scalelike setae scattered on mesepisternum in the form of a band, mesepimeron with several patches of scalelike setae.
Structure: Head ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 12 – 15 ): Transverse in dorsal view, weakly elongate in lateral view, clypeus invisible in dorsal view; vertex flattened and broad, posterior margin in the form of a complete carina; mandibular plate flattened and triangular, maxillary plate weakly humped, buccular narrowly elongate; labium slightly stout, reaching posterior margin of mesocoxae; antennal segment I cylindrical, weakly enlarged, segment II slender, elongate, straight, distally weakly enlarged, segment III weakly enlarged mesially, length of segment IV distinctly shorter than that of segment III. Thorax: Pronotum broad, trapeziform, anterior margin weakly convex, finely conforming to posterior margin of vertex, lateral margin straight, posterior marign concave mesially, anterior and posterior lobe not demarcated, posterior lobe moderately elevated; scutellum flattened, weakly humped mesially; hemelytron broad, exterior margin weakly convex; clavus slightly elevated along claval commissure; cuneus slightly declivous, lateral margin weakly rounded; femora stout, rounded mesially, tibiae elongate, meta-tibiae weakly curved. Abdomen: Moderately broad and stout.
Male genitalia ( Figs. 16–20 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ): Vesica L-shaped; elongate, lanceolate, spinelike projection located on proximal 2/3 of vesica with a distinctly sharp process basally ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ); left paramere boat-shaped with blunt and short hypophysis and sensory lobe ( Figs. 17, 18 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ); right paramere broadly flattened, leaflike ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ); phallotheca stout with apex broadly enlarged ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ).
Female ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 11 ): Macropterous. Surface and coloration similar to male, the size weakly bigger than male, body broader.
Female genitalia: Structure as figure 21.
Host: Salix sp., Ulmus pumila .
Distribution: China (Heilongjiang, Beijing, Nei Mongol, Henan, Gansu, Ningxia, Shaanxi), Far East of the USSR (Primorsk Territory, Transbaikal), Mongolia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pherolepis aenescens ( Reuter, 1901 )
Zhang, Xu & Liu, Guo-Qing 2009 |
Hypseloecus aenescens
Schuh 1989: 4 |
Kerzhner 1970: 639 |
Monosynamma aenescens
Kulik 1968: 140 |
Cavalho 1958: 75 |
Neocoris aenescens
Reuter 1901: 188 |