Udea rajabii, Alipanah & Slamka, 2023

Alipanah, Helen & Slamka, František, 2023, A revision of the subfamily Spilomelinae (Lepidoptera, Crambidae) in Iran with description of a new species, Zootaxa 5248 (1), pp. 1-70 : 9-21

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5248.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4F0414D1-147A-41CF-AEDB-8C88A400258A

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7682762

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C13F87B9-2157-CB5E-FF7D-D7B5FDF4E935

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Udea rajabii
status

sp. nov.

Udea rajabii sp. n.

( Figs 3A‒F View FIGURE 3 , 4A‒D View FIGURE 4 , 5A‒D View FIGURE 5 , 6A–H View FIGURE 6 , 7A–C View FIGURE 7 , 8A–H View FIGURE 8 )

Material examined. Holotype, Ô, HMIM: Iran, Fârs Prov.: Shirâz , 10 km N Sivand, 1150 m, 15.v.1974, Pâzuki, Abâi leg. (gen. prep. HA-2716, HMIM).

Paratypes, 109 ÔÔ 28 ♀♀, HMIM: Iran, 6 ÔÔ 2 ♀♀, same data as the holotype; Alborz Prov.: 1 Ô, Eshtehârd, Halgheh Darreh , 27.vi.1968, Âyatollâhi leg. (gen. prep. HA-2718, HMIM) , 6 ÔÔ 1 ♀, Karaj, Âzâdbar , 2300 m, 12.vii.1996, Barâri, Badii leg. (gen. prep. HA-2714, HMIM) , 5 ÔÔ, 40 km N Karaj, Âsârâ , 1850 m, 27.vi.1971, Safavi, Borumand, Kâviân, Ghâzioff leg. , 1 Ô, Karaj, Dizin , 4.viii.1973, Ebrâhimi leg. , 1 Ô, Karaj, Dizin , 2900 m, 12.viii.1981, Hâshemi leg. , 1 Ô, Karaj, Kandovân, Sarchâl , 2800 m, 4.–8.vii.1977, Pâzuki, Mortazavihâ leg. , 2 ÔÔ, Karaj, Shahrestânak, Kil Kolâ fountain, 2400 m, 20.vii.1988, Mirzâyâns, Badii leg. , 1 Ô, Tâleghân , 26.–31.vii.1976, Kâviân leg. , 2 ♀♀, Tâleghân, Kalânak , 1950 m, 26.vi.1994, Ebrâhimi leg. (gen. prep. HA-2739, HMIM) ; Châhârmahâl and Bakhtiâri Prov. : 1 Ô, 11.vi.1973, Irânshahr leg. , 5 ÔÔ 3 ♀♀, Gandomân, Sabzeh Kuh , 4.–5.vi.1989, 2500 m, Mirzâyâns, Badii leg. (gen. prep. HA-2737, HMIM) , 5 ÔÔ, Kuhrang, Heyrân , N 32°20 ΄31″, E 50°26 ΄56″, 2305 m, 6.vi.2005, Ebrâhimi, Hâjiesmailiân leg. GoogleMaps , 1 Ô, S Shalamzâr, Tang-e Chezghân , 11.vii.1982, Borumand, Pâzuki leg. , 4 ÔÔ 4 ♀♀, 5 km SW Shalamzâr, Tang-e Chezghân , 7.–10.vii.1983, Mirzâyâns, Borumand leg. (gen. prep. HA-2543, HMIM) , 1 Ô 3 ♀♀, Shalamzâr, Tang-e Chezghân , 7.–10.vii.1989, Mirzâyâns, Badii leg. , 1 Ô, Borujen, Suleghân , 2500 m, 5.vi.1998, Mofidi-Neyestânak, Ebrâhimi leg. , 1 Ô, S Borujen, 6 km S Dorâhân , 1850–2100 m, 1.vi.2005, Hofmann, Meineke leg. (gen. prep. HA-2479, HMIM) ; East Âzarbâijân Prov.: 1 Ô, Marâgheh , 15.vi.1991, Hâshemi leg. , 2 ÔÔ, Miâneh, Bozghush , 2250 m, 29.–30.vii.1992, ParchamiArâghi, Badii leg. , 2 ÔÔ, Sahand, Chini Bolâgh , 2300 m, 25.vi.1985, Mirzâyâns, Pâzuki leg. (gen. prep. HA-2712, HMIM) , 1 ♀, Tabriz, Gharah Chaman , 1100 m, 23.vi.1985, Mirzâyâns, Pâzuki leg. (gen. prep. HA-2721, HMIM) , 1 ♀, Tabriz, Bostânâbâd, Tekmeh Dâsh , 13.vii.1983, Kâzemi, Noshâd leg. ; Esfahân Prov.: 1 Ô, Esfahân , 19.vi.1973, Irânshahr leg. , 2 ÔÔ 2 ♀♀, Khânsâr, Golestân Kuh , 2700 m, 3, 4.vii.1983, Mirzâyâns, Borumand leg. , 1 ♀, Dârân , 30.vi.1970, Safavi, Hâshemi leg. , 1 Ô, E Denâ Mt., Nurâbâd , 2450 m, 8.vi.2005, Hofmann, Meineke leg. ;

Fârs Prov.: 4 ÔÔ 1 ♀, 50 km NW Sepidân, Tang-e Sorkh , 2250 m, 16.vi.1972, Ebrâhimi, Pâzuki leg. (gen. prep. HA-2736, HMIM) , 1 Ô, Sepidân, Shool , 17.vi.1973, Hâshemi, Zairi leg. (gen. prep. HA-2717, HMIM) , Sepidân, Komehr, Mârgoon , 2100 m, 19.–22.viii.2000, Badii, Moghaddam, Mofidi-Neyestânak leg. , 8 ÔÔ 2 ♀♀, Mamasani, Châhtut , 1.–8.vi.1976, Abâi leg. ; Qazvin Prov.: 1 Ô, Alamut , 14.vii.1994, Ebrâhimi leg. ; Hamedân Prov.: 1 Ô, Malâyer, Lashkardar protected area, N 34°14 ΄43.4″, E 48°54 ΄00.9″, 1939 m, 10.vii.2014, Afsariân leg. GoogleMaps ; Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad Prov. : 1 Ô, 1700 m, 12.v.1968, Mirzâyâns, Hâshemi leg. , 1 Ô, Sisakht , 2100 m, 16.vi.1986, Mirzâyâns, Hâshemi leg. , 1 Ô, 5–7 km N Sisakht , 1800 m, 2.vi.1983, Irânshahr leg. , 1 Ô, Yâsuj, Sisakht , 2430 m, N 30°53 ΄45″, E 51°25 ΄10″, 22.vi.2005, Zahiri, Nematiân, Falsafi leg. GoogleMaps ; Kordestân Prov.: 5 ÔÔ, 45 km SW Saghez, Saghez- Bâneh Rd. , 2000 m, 30.vi.1975, Pâzuki leg. (gen. prep. HA-2713, HMIM) ; Mâzandarân Prov.: 1 ♀, Lârijân, Malâr , 8.vii.1971, Hâshemi, Zairi leg. ; Markazi Prov.: 16 ÔÔ 2 ♀♀, Khomein, Nâzi vill., N 33°41 ΄50.0″, E 50°02.0 ΄17.7″, 1872 m, 7.vi.2013, Afsariân leg. (gen. prep. HA-2738, HMIM) GoogleMaps , 1 Ô, Tafresh, Dastgerd , 2300–2500 m, 15, 16.vi.2005, Meineke leg. ; Tehrân Prov.: 7 ÔÔ, Shemshak , 25.vii.1969, Mirzâyâns, Abâi leg. , 3 ÔÔ, Shemshak , 2700 m, 11.–12.viii.1981, Hâshemi leg. , 1 Ô, Rudehen , 23.vii.1969, Mirzâyâns, Abâi leg. ; West Âzarbâijân Prov.: 1 Ô, Takâb- Shâhindezh Rd. , N 36°32 ΄19.7″, E 46°41 ΄43.9″, 1521 m, 2.vii.2013, Afsariân leg. GoogleMaps , 1 Ô, W Mâku, Ghezelbolâgh , 27.vii.1976, Pâzuki, Borumand leg. (gen. prep. HA-2748, HMIM) ; Zanjân Prov.: 1 Ô, N Zanjân, Armaghân Khâneh, Mâri vill., N 36°59 ΄52.0″, E 48°28 ΄39″, Hâjiesmailiân, Nâserzâdeh, Montreuil leg. GoogleMaps , 1 Ô, Zanjân- Bijâr Rd. , 50 km SW Zanjân, 1700 m, 28.vi.1975, Pâzuki leg.

NHMW: 2 ÔÔ 1 ♀: Iran, Alborz Prov.: 1 Ô, Karaj, Elburz Mt., Kandovân Rd. , 2800 m, 3.–8.vii.1936, Schwingenschuss leg. (gen. prep. MV 18589 Slamka, 2012); Armenia, Gehard, 1 Ô 1 ♀, 40 km E Yerevan, 1700 m, 1.–2.viii.1976, Kasy & Vartian leg. (1 Ô 1 ♀ gen. prep. MV [unavailable] Slamka, 2012) .

MGAB: 1 Ô, Turkey (E), Kazkoparan [formerly Armenia], 1901, Mihail Korb leg. (gen. prep. 479 Slamka, 2012); 1 ♀ Turkey , Konya (gen. prep. 480 Slamka, 2012) .

Diagnosis. The newly described species is close to U. praepetalis both in external appearance and genitalia. It is externally distinguished from U. praepetalis by the more or less smooth postmedial line ( Figs 3A‒F View FIGURE 3 , 5A‒D View FIGURE 5 ) compared with the finely dentate one in U. praepetalis ( Fig. 5E‒H View FIGURE 5 ). The ground colour of the forewing upperside in the new species varies from yellowish-creamy without distinct scattered pink scales ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3 ) to pale pinkish-yellow ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ), heavily admixed with pink scales ( Figs 3F View FIGURE 3 , 5A, B, D View FIGURE 5 ) and pale brown ( Fig. 3E View FIGURE 3 ). The underside of the forewing varies from yellowish-creamy to dirty creamy ( Figs 3B, D View FIGURE 3 , 5C View FIGURE 5 ). The ground colour of the forewing cannot be considered as a discriminant character to separate the newly described species from U. praepetalis with yellowish-creamy upperside bearing a few scattered pink scales, but the two can be identified based on male and female genitalia. The male genitalia of these two species are distinguished as follows:

1) Shape of the fibula, which in both taxa is nearly hook-shaped apically. In U. praepetalis , gradually narrowed towards the apex, with a nearly smooth stem ( Fig. 9A, B, D, E View FIGURE 9 ), whilst it is almost finger-shaped with a distinctly wrinkled stem in U. rajabii sp. n. ( Figs 6A‒F View FIGURE 6 , 7A‒C View FIGURE 7 ).

2) Shape of pseudognathos which is trapezoidal in U. rajabii sp. n. ( Figs 6A, B View FIGURE 6 , 7A‒C View FIGURE 7 ), but narrow and stripshaped in U. praepetalis (9A, D, E).

3) Saccus in U. praepetalis is slightly broader with spherical central part ( Fig. 9A, D, E View FIGURE 9 ) compared with that of the newly described species which has an egg-shaped central area ( Figs 6A, B View FIGURE 6 , 7A‒C View FIGURE 7 ).

The main differences of their female genitalia are as follows:

1) In U. rajabii sp. n. the posterior end of the ductus bursae is sclerotized ( Fig. 8A, B, F, G View FIGURE 8 ); while in U. praepetalis it is membranous ( Fig. 10A, D View FIGURE 10 ).

2) In both species, the cestum is an irregularly sclerotized longitudinal structure. In U. rajabii sp. n. it is heavily sclerotized and equipped with minute and sharp spines internally (8D, E, H), whilst in U. praepetalis it is spineless and weakly sclerotized ( Fig. 10A, C, D, E View FIGURE 10 ).

3) The anterior half of the antrum in U. praepetalis is more or less convexed and cup-shaped ( Fig. 10A, B, D View FIGURE 10 ), but it is nearly funnel-shaped in the new species ( Fig. 8A, B, F, G View FIGURE 8 ).

4) The more sclerotized side walls of the colliculum in U. praepetalis have shorter edges ( Fig. 10A, B, D View FIGURE 10 ) compared with those of U. rajabii sp. n. ( Fig. 8A, B, F, G View FIGURE 8 ).

Description. Male ( Figs 3A, B, E, F View FIGURE 3 , 4A, B View FIGURE 4 , 5A, B, C View FIGURE 5 ). Head: Frons with nearly smooth, pale ochreous to ochreous-creamy scales; scales on vertex elongate, erect, ochreous-creamy, white at the middle between the compound eyes, external part of the antennae next to the compound eyes, and around oculi; labial palpus porrect with third segment slightly hanging, dark ochreous admixed with pink scales at the upper half laterally, first segment white at the lower half of lateral side, becoming whitish-creamy to pale ochreous-creamy towards the second and third segments, length 2.7–3.2 times the horizontal diameter of compound eye (n = 39), second segment the longest, nearly more than four times the length of third segment, first and third segments nearly in equal length (third one slightly shorter that the first segment); maxillary palpus slender, porrect, covered with dirty-creamy to pale ochreous-creamy or ochreous scales; proboscis with creamy scales basally; antennae with pale ochreous-creamy scales dorsally, bearing minute and dense ciliae ventrally.

Thorax: Nota and patagia smooth-scaled, pale ochreous-creamy admixed with pink scales anteriorly. Forewing ( Figs 3A, B, E, F View FIGURE 3 , 5A‒C View FIGURE 5 ) elongate, with nearly straight costa slightly arched outwards near the apex, termen obliquely rounded. Forewing length 9.3–12.3 mm (x = 11.15 mm ± 0.71, n = 62); upperside shiny, from yellowishcreamy without distinct scattered scales to pale pinkish-yellow, heavily admixed with pink scales, and pale brown. If with pink scales, they are mostly concentrated at costal margin. With pale brown antemedial and postmedial lines, antemedial line nearly straight to very slightly dentate with slight indentation near the costal margin, postmedial line mostly straight, broadly concave medially with a distinct inwardly-directed curve at two-thirds towards dorsum, reniform and antemedial spots light brown to dark pinkish-brown, fringes dirty creamy at distal half and pinkishcreamy basally; underside shiny, creamy, with traces of antemedial and postmedial lines and spots. Hindwing shiny, creamy with hardly visible pale brown medial line and discoidal spot, fringes creamy; underside yellowish-creamy to dirty creamy, with traces of medial line and discoidal spot, but sometimes hardly visible.

Abdomen: Creamy, first two segments and sometimes others admixed with yellow scales dorsally. Genitalia ( Figs 6A‒H View FIGURE 6 , 7A‒C View FIGURE 7 ) with uncus triangular at base and ovate apically, with a narrow neck bearing a few setae laterally, apex densely setose dorso-laterally; pseudognathos trapezoidal with rounded corners; transtilla triangular basally, narrow at the middle; valva elongate, wide at base and gradually narrowed distally with rounded apex, costa slightly concave basally, sometimes slightly concave near the apex, fibula nearly finger-shaped, extending ventrad, weakly sclerotized with wrinkled surface throughout and blunt apex, slightly curved distally; sacculus slightly inflated; saccus rounded anteriorly, rarely keeled, egg-shaped in the central part; Juxta nearly trapezoidal and convexed anteriorly, with dorsal one-third forked; phallus rod-shaped, mostly with slight curvature at distal one-third, cornuti included of 5–8 large and pointed spindle-shaped sclerotized structures, and mostly 6–9 small ones next to the large structures ( Figs 6A, B, G, H View FIGURE 6 , 7B, C View FIGURE 7 ). The small structures hardly visible in most cases and rarely missing ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ).

Female. Head and Thorax: Essentially as described for male, except antennae with narrower basal half and very sparse minute ciliae ventrally ( Fig. 4C, D View FIGURE 4 ); length of labial palpus 2.92‒3.28 times the horizontal diameter of compound eye (n = 12). Forewing ( Figs 3C, D View FIGURE 3 , 5D View FIGURE 5 ) with length of 10.6–12 mm (x= 11.27 mm ± 0.49, n = 19).

Abdomen: Essentially as in male. Genitalia ( Fig. 8A‒H View FIGURE 8 ) with papillae anales flat, crescent-shaped, densely setose; anterior apophyses 0.6–0.75 as long as the posterior apophyses (n = 3); antrum funnel-shaped, sclerotized at anterior half, with a mesoventral groove and two nearly broad lateral longitudinal ridges anteriorly; colliculum deeply sclerotized, with a distinct groove mesoventrally and two relatively long, lateral longitudinal ridges; ductus bursae slender, posteriorly sclerotized, with a mesoventral groove, border with bursa copulatrix hardly distinguishable; ductus seminalis arises from colliculum at the junction with ductus bursae; bursa copulatrix elongate, pearshaped, cestum ( Fig. 8A, D, E, F, H View FIGURE 8 ) elongate, narrow, irregularly-shaped, with pointed minute spines directed inwardly into bursa copulatrix; signum tear-shaped, sclerotized, with numerous pointed tiny spines directed inwardly into bursa copulatrix.

Etymology. The new species is named after late Prof. Gholamreza Rajabi, the well-known Iranian entomologist, who was serious in his work, with a lot of energy and innovative ideas.

Distribution. Iran, Turkey (Konya and Kazkoparan), Armenia (Gehard).

Remarks. There is an intraspecific variation in the shape of valvae among the examined males. In most of them, the width of the valva gradually decreases towards the apex. However, in a few specimens it is parallel-sided at distal half. Another variation was observed in the length of cestum—in some of the examined females it is long, but in others it is relatively short.

MGAB

Muzeul de Istorie Naturala "Grigore Antipa"

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Crambidae

Genus

Udea

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF