Synclera interruptalis (Amsel, 1950)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5248.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4F0414D1-147A-41CF-AEDB-8C88A400258A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10556930 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C13F87B9-2141-CB55-FF7D-D47AFADFEF91 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Synclera interruptalis (Amsel, 1950) |
status |
|
Synclera interruptalis (Amsel, 1950) View in CoL
( Figs 14C, D View FIGURE 14 , 15F‒H View FIGURE 15 , 16B, E, F View FIGURE 16 )
Material examined. 1 Ô 1 ♀: HMIM : 1 Ô, Iran, Hormozgân Prov.: Sirik , 100 m, 30.iv.1996, Badii, Ardeh, V. Nazari leg. (gen. prep. HA-2813, HMIM) .
NHRS: Paratype, 1 ♀, Iran, Baluchestan (= Sistân and Baluchestân Prov.) , Bender Tchahbahar (= Châbahâr), 6.ii.1938, Amsel leg. coll. Brandt (gen. prep. NHRS-TOBI 000005233).
Remarks. This species was temporarily placed by Amsel (1950) in the genus Synclera based on the similarity of its genital structure to that of S. bleusei . However, its systematic position remained to be clarified. In this study we had a single male of S. interruptalis as well as four males and 11 females of S. bleusei . Additional information about S. interruptalis female genitalia was obtained after examining the genitalia of paratype of the species which is deposited in NHRS. The results showed that these two species are very similar to each other externally, except the smaller size of S. interruptalis (forewing length of male: 6.8 mm, n = 1) compared with S. bleusei (forewing length of male: 8.5‒9 mm (x = 8.75 mm ± 0.35, n = 2); female: 8.6‒9.9 mm (x = 9.15 mm ± 0.46, n = 11), and different markings of the marginal areas of their fore- and hindwings ( Fig. 14A‒D View FIGURE 14 ). Their male genitalia is very similar to each other ( Fig. 15A‒H View FIGURE 15 ), and partly different from some of the remaining Synclera species in the shape of uncus, valva, fibula, and vinculum. More or less the same results were obtained while examining their female genitalia ( Fig. 16C‒F View FIGURE 16 ). It is most probable that upon further studies and examining the type material of the species belonging to both Synclera and Glyphodes , some changes, or taxon replacements, may be required at the species level. For example, probable exclusion of Synclera traducalis (Zeller) from the genus Synclera and its inclusion in the genus Glyphodes .
According to the results of this study, the differences of male genitalia of S. bleusei and S. interruptalis are as follows:
1) In S. bleusei cornuti consist of 6–8 small spindle-shaped ( Fig. 15A, C, D View FIGURE 15 ) and sometimes hardly visible ( Fig. 15E View FIGURE 15 ) sclerotized structures having no bases, as well as narrow sclerotized plates proximally with a small distance from them ( Fig. 15A, C‒E View FIGURE 15 ); while in S. interruptalis they consist of two large spindle-shaped sclerotized structures having relatively equal-sized bases. The proximal narrow sclerotized plates are placed at the basal part of the spindles bases ( Fig. 15F, H View FIGURE 15 ).
2) The fibula of S. interruptalis is relatively narrower than in S. bleusei and almost narrowed towards the apex gradually ( Fig. 15F, G View FIGURE 15 ). In S. bleusei , fibula narrows with a lower slope towards the apex and sometimes looks finger-shaped ( Fig. 15A, B View FIGURE 15 ).
3) The structure of the chaetose hair pencil articulating with the anterior edge of the vinculum-tegumen connection in these two species is slightly different ( Fig. 15A, F View FIGURE 15 ).
4) Pseudognathos in S. bleusei is relatively narrower and slightly longer than in S. interruptalis ( Fig. 15A, F View FIGURE 15 ).
5) The sacculus of S. bleusei is stouter than in S. interruptalis with more curvature basally ( Fig. 15A, F View FIGURE 15 ).
6) The sclerotized plates of the eighth abdominal tergite and sternite of the two species have different structures, especially in the width of both anterior and posterior ends of tergum, and distal one-thirds of sternum which has a curvature in S. bleusei compared with that of S. interruptalis ( Fig. 16A, B View FIGURE 16 ).
The female genitalia of these two species are very similar and only differ in a few characters ( Fig. 16C‒F View FIGURE 16 ):
1) Shape of the signum in both species is quite similar, but their placement is different. In S. bleusei it is placed slightly beyond the middle part of bursa copulatrix ( Fig. 16C, D View FIGURE 16 ); while in S. interruptalis it is placed at the posterior end ( Fig. 16E, F View FIGURE 16 ).
2) Length of the membranous part between colliculum and antrum in S. bleusei ( Fig. 16C View FIGURE 16 ) is distinctly longer and wider than that of S. interruptalis ( Fig. 16E View FIGURE 16 ).
Distribution. Iran: Sistan and Baluchestan Province (Chabahar; type locality) (Amsel 1950, 1961).
NHRS |
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Entomology Collections |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |