Leiosphaeridia Eisenack, 1958

Atfy, Haytham El, Abeed, Qusay & Uhl, Dieter, 2023, Non-pollen palynomorph and palynofacies assemblages from the Lower Cretaceous of Iraq: A glimpse into palaeobiology and palaeoenvironment, Geodiversitas 45 (11), pp. 353-366 : 357

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2023v45a11

publication LSID

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CED4FE1B-3702-496B-9891-AEB5006F0D0E

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10658672

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BF7487C2-FFB7-FF87-7592-FA70BDE7F9E3

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Leiosphaeridia Eisenack, 1958
status

 

Leiosphaeridia Eisenack, 1958 .

Leiosphaerids are considered to be algal cysts produced in the course of the reproductive phase of the life cycle; an assumption that is reinforced by the occurrence of an encystment opening ( Moczydłowska 2008). Leiosphaeridia is known from the Precambrian to the present ( Traverse 2007), and includes spheroidal to ellipsoidal, organic-walled microfossils of variable morphology, diameter, and wall thickness.

The unicellular Leiosphaeridia are produced by planktic algae, with alternating sexual or vegetative generations in their life cycle ( Moczydłowska 2008). Leiosphaerids are presumed to embody either several planktonic green algal species (e.g. Tappan 1980), photosynthetic protists ( Traverse 2007), or other microorganisms of so far unidentified affinities ( Moczydłowska et al. 2010). The eukaryotic algal origin of leiosphaerids has been suggested based on morphology, size, cell-wall, and palaeoecology ( Tappan 1980; Colbath & Grenfell 1995 and discussion therein). Based on the discussion above, and the suggestions from previous studies (e.g. Traverse 2007), they can no longer be referred to as acritarchs.

The recorded specimens from the Yamama Formation ( Fig. 3 View FIG L-O) are represented by bag-shaped, thin-walled, flattened, often collapsed, and sometimes folded palynomorphs in which the encystment opening is rarely preserved (e.g. Fig. 3O View FIG ), with a maximum diameter of 35-40 µm in average. They are preserved in relatively similar proportions in samples 09-234, 09-255, and 09-262, and completely absent in samples 09-242 and 09-243 ( Fig. 2 View FIG ).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF