Urodacus bicolor
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/evolsyst.3.37464 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:87602625-AF8D-4A3F-BAE5-F35C09FB6C00 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BF3C2D1E-3CBB-59D0-834C-44661DC52DDE |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Urodacus bicolor |
status |
|
Urodacus bicolor Fig. 64 A–B View Figure 64
Urodacus bicolor Werner, 1936: 182-183, fig. 3
Current senior synonym.
Urodacus novaehollandiae Peters, 1861 [synonymized by L. E. Koch 1977: 194]
Syntypes.
1 ♀ ( Fig. 64 A–B View Figure 64 , ZMH-A0001081); 1 ♀ ( ZMH-A0002185), Western Australia, Pickering Brook [32°02 ’51” S, 116°11 ’54” E], Wilhelm Michaelsen leg., Hamburg’s South-West Australia Expedition 1905 ( ZMH, Eing. Nr. 4.1926).
Remarks.
Werner (1936) reported a male and a female from Pickering Brook and a female from Upper Blackwood District, Brancaster (J. M. Whistler coll.). L. E. Koch (1977) examined the latter specimen and noted that it is a male contrary to Werner (1936) and listed it as a syntype of U. bicolor lodged in the ZMH. Koch also studied the specimens from Pickering Brook and determined them as male and female syntypes of U. bicolor . The specimen from Brancaster could not be found in the collection of the ZMH and may be lost. Given the discrepancies between the sexes of the specimens examined and the sexes reported by previous workers, we decided not to designate a lectotype. The male reported by Werner and Koch should ideally be designated as lectotype but the specimen could not be found during the course of this work.
Remarks on collector.
See paragraph on Cercophonius granulosus Kraepelin, 1908 above.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |