Nothrus longipilus
publication ID |
ORI111 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0DC6B575-3CB3-41C1-A3EC-850520AE4487 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6285533 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BCE69451-6944-84E5-143F-B2CC33C49157 |
treatment provided by |
Thomas |
scientific name |
Nothrus longipilus |
status |
|
Nothrus longipilus View in CoL (Berlese, 1910)
Angelia anauniensis var. longipila Berlese , 1910b, p. 381.
Berlese described the present species as a variety of Angelia anauniensis . In the short diagnosis Berlese mentions that the measurements are hardly greater (0.980 X 0.460 mm, posterior hairs probably included) than in anauniensis , but that the posterior notogastral hairs are twice as long and slender, although less than in sylvestris . Because Berlese (1896) already placed anauniensis in the synonymy of silvestris , this diagnosis appears incomprehensible.
In the Berlese Collection two slides are present: nos. 122/5, 6 from Mugello (Italy), both designated as type. The two specimens are tridactylous so that they do not belong to the silvestris group. The measurements are the following: length 0.860-0.910; breadth 0.445-0.455; h2 0.125; ps1 0.110 mm.
The species is apparently related to Nothrus borussicus Sellnick , but the posterior hairs are relatively shorter. Because specimens in the Berlese Collection, which are labelled as anauniensis and sylvestris , represent silvestris and biciliatus respectively, it appears not logical that Berlese described the species as a variety of anauniensis .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Nothrus longipilus
van der Hammen, L. 1959 |
Angelia anauniensis var. longipila
Berlese 1885 |