Rudra geniculata Peckham & Peckham, 1885
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7169417 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:75C5AD6B-2DFC-4751-80D5-010E85BB31C8 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BC580569-FFA6-FFB9-FE01-FA75E432F8D4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rudra geniculata Peckham & Peckham, 1885 |
status |
|
Rudra geniculata Peckham & Peckham, 1885 View in CoL
Figures 1‒5 View Figures 1-4 View Figure 5
Rudra geniculata Peckham & Peckham, 1885 View in CoL : Peckham & Peckham, 1885; Peckham & Peckham 1894; F. O. Pickard-Cambridge 1901; Chickering 1946; Galiano 1984; Maddison 1996; World Spider Catalog, 2020. Type material deposited in the MCZ, BMNH, AMNH and Gainesville, not examined.
Material examined. 2♀ Colombia, Córdoba, Montería [8°47'25.6"N, 75°51'42.4"W], [2m] 22 Apr 2018, 3 Oct 2018, urban area, Mangifera indica L GoogleMaps . tree, shaking foliage, E. Bedoya – Roqueme col . ( LEUC; OARA – 089).
Diagnosis. According to Peckham & Peckham (1885) and Galiano (1984), the female of R. geniculata Peckham & Peckham, 1885 is easily distinguishable from other Rudra species, by the appearance of the epigyne with two holes and spermatheca with spiral ducts, at least in part.
Short description. The females collected in the urban area of Montería ( Colombia) are very similar to the description made by Galiano (1984): medium-sized or smaller spiders ( Figures 1‒2 View Figures 1-4 ); slightly marked thoracic stria, located well behind the posterior lateral eyes ( Figure 1 View Figures 1-4 ); female chelicerae, short, vertical, retromargin with an obliquely cut or bi-indented hull; sternum truncated forward, equal to or wider than the base of the lip ( Figure 1 View Figures 1-4 ). Legs: first pair of legs much longer and thicker than the others; all femora with thin spines, sometimes replaced by setae; tibia I and metatarsus I with very thick and long spines, implanted on articular tubers ( Figure 2 View Figures 1-4 ). Legs II, III and IV thin, with few spines ( Figure 2 View Figures 1-4 ). CO with openings to the sides ( Figure 3 View Figures 1-4 ); with spiral ducts, at least in part ( Figures 3‒4 View Figures 1-4 ). Spines (specimens from Colombia): Leg I: F= d 1-1-1; v r0-1-1; T= p 0-0-0; v 2-2-2; M= p 0-0-0; v 2-2; Leg II: F= d 1-1-1; v r 0-1-1; T= p 0-0-0; v 2-2-2; M= p 0-0-0; v 2-2; Leg III: F= d 1-1-1; v= 0-1-1; T= p 0-0-0; v ap 1-0-0; M= p 1ap-r1-0; v 0-0-0; Leg IV: F= d 1-1-1; v 0-0-0; T= 0; M=0.
Measurements (mm; specimens from Colombia). Two females: TL= 4.12-4.53; CH= 1.34; CL= 1.91- 1.93; CW=1.29-1.31; AL= 2.52-2.58; AERW=1.17-1.19; PERW=1.18-1.19; LOQ= 0.62–0.64; PMEP= 0.22– 0.25; eyes of the second row separated from the ALE by 0.14-0.16 mm and from the PLE by 0.15-0.16 mm.
Distribution. Rudra geniculata Peckham & Peckham, 1885 was previously known only from Guatemala and Panama in Central America ( Metzner, 2020; WSC, 2020). This is the first record of this genus and species from Colombia, and from the northern hemisphere of South America ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 ). The specimen from Colombia was collected by shaking foliage of the introduced Mango tree, Mangifera indica L., in an urban perimeter during daylight hours.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rudra geniculata Peckham & Peckham, 1885
Bedoya-Roqueme, Edwin, Lopez-Villada, Samia & Nadal, Maria F. 2020 |
Rudra geniculata
Peckham & Peckham 1885 |