Leptocera gongylotheca Buck, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2039.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5319454 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BB4C084E-FFE2-A715-0CE0-FAC8FB0EA7F4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Leptocera gongylotheca Buck |
status |
sp. nov. |
Leptocera gongylotheca Buck , new species
( Figs. 69–75 View FIGURES 69–75 )
Description. Indistinguishable from L. argentinica sp.n. except for the shape of the female spermathecae ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 69–75 ): Spermatheca perfectly spherical, lacking narrow, ridged, subcylindrical basal section; entire surface (except very base) bumpy. Male terminalia as in Figs. 69–72 View FIGURES 69–75 , female terminalia as in Figs. 73–75 View FIGURES 69–75 .
Type material. Holotype ♀ and 13 ♂♂, 12 ♀♀ paratypes ( DEBU): ARGENTINA, Prov. Salta, Santa Rosa de Tastil 100 km W Salta, 3,000 m, 21.ii.1992, very dry along creek, S.A. Marshall. Note: The identity of all except one female was confirmed through dissection. Males cannot be distinguished from L. argentinica sp.n. (males unassociated with females are listed under L. argentinica sp.n.).
Etymology. The species name is a noun in apposition and refers to the diagnostic, spherical spermathecae (Gr. gongylos: round, spherical).
Distribution. Only known from the type locality in northern Argentina (Salta Province) where it occurs together with its sibling species L. argentinica sp.n.
Discussion. We were uncertain at first how to interpret the puzzling case of spermathecal variation presented by L. argentinica / gongylotheca sp.n. species pair. It seems clear that the different spermathecal shapes do not represent different developmental stages (e.g., pre- or post-insemination) since there are no intermediate stages, and the spermathecal base of the elongate type (here described as L. argentinica sp.n.) is just as sclerotized and inflexible as the remainder of the spermathecal body. We decided against interpreting the different shapes as a case of structural polymorphism (unknown so far in spermathecae of Sphaeroceridae ) because in the L. caenosa group there is another example of the exact same type of variation (spherical vs. elongate spermathecae), which in this case is undoubtedly due to specific distinctness ( L. erythrocera and L. sphaerotheca sp.n.). In this species pair the spermathecal differences are correlated with one external character (length of posteroapical bristles of mid tibia) as well as ecological differences ( L. sphaerotheca sp.n. occurs at higher altitudes than L. erythrocera ; see Discussion under L. sphaerotheca sp.n.).
DEBU |
Ontario Insect Collection, University of Guelph |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.