Yaginumaella daolangi C. Wang, Mi & Li, 2025
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1257.160127 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:531C5E66-8EF0-4124-BFD9-C21B7ACC317F |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17485454 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BAF52F2D-8F9E-507A-9347-E5037A6D5F00 |
|
treatment provided by |
|
|
scientific name |
Yaginumaella daolangi C. Wang, Mi & Li |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Yaginumaella daolangi C. Wang, Mi & Li sp. nov.
Figs 7 View Figure 7 , 8 View Figure 8
Type material.
Holotype • ♂ ( TRU -JS 0839 ), China: Yunnan: Kunming City, Guandu District, Shajin Village ( 25°5.09'N, 103°1.02'E, ca 2,340 m), 20. x. 2023; H. Qiu leg. GoogleMaps Paratypes • 1 ♀ ( TRU -JS 0840 ), same data as for holotype GoogleMaps ; • 1 ♂ ( IZCAS -Ar 45884 ), Sichuan, Miyi County, Binggu Township, Maidichong Village ( 26°40.76'N, 102°3.75'E, ca 2,240 m), 7. vi. 2024, X. Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, and Q. Z. Meng leg. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis.
The male of Yaginumaella daolangi sp. nov. resembles that of Y. ususudi ( Yaginuma, 1972) in having a thick embolus originating from ca 9 o′clock position, but can be easily distinguished by the retrolateral tibial apophysis is curved towards retrolateral side distally (Fig. 7 B, C View Figure 7 ) vs almost straight in Y. ususudi ( Yaginuma 1972: fig. 10). The female of this new species can be easily distinguished from other congeners by postero-ventrally opened epigynal hood (Fig. 8 A View Figure 8 ) vs epigynal hood posteriorly or posterolaterally opened in others (see the drawings of the congeners on Metzner 2025).
Description.
Male (Figs 7 A – C View Figure 7 , 8 C, D, F, G View Figure 8 ). Total length 4.65. Cephalothorax 2.23 long, 1.68 wide. Abdomen 2.40 long, 1.39 wide. Eye sizes and inter distances: AME 0.43, ALE 0.26, PLE 0.24, AERW 1.45, PERW 1.39, EFL 0.90. Legs: I 4.61 (1.43, 0.85, 1.10, 0.75, 0.48), II 3.94 (1.25, 0.73, 0.85, 0.63, 0.48), III 4.57 (1.48, 0.68, 0.93, 0.93, 0.55), IV 4.87 (1.48, 0.68, 1.08, 1.08, 0.55). Carapace elevated, orange to dark, covered with sparse, long, dark setae on cephalic region, dense white setae behind PMEs, with pair of lateral submarginal white setal bands, and longitudinal, central yellow stripe extending across thorax; fovea red-brown, longitudinal. Chelicerae orange-yellow, with type dentition. Endites yellow with pale disto-inner portions, covered with clusters of dense dark setae on inner distal margins. Labium slightly darker than endites. Sternum yellow to brown, with truncated anterior edge and tapered distal portion, ~ 1.3 × longer than wide. Legs setose, spiny. Dorsum of abdomen mainly dark and spotted, covered with sparse, long, dark setae and dense, shorter, dark and pale setae, with central, gradually broadened, longitudinal yellow stripe followed by transverse, sub-triangular yellow patch; venter colored as dorsum, with dotted lines.
Palp (Fig. 7 A – C View Figure 7 ): tibia slightly wider than long in ventral view; retrolateral tibial apophysis strongly sclerotized, straight extending until curved retrolaterally at distal 1 / 3, with rather pointed tip; cymbium somewhat longer than wide, with truncated anterior edge; tegulum elongate-oval, with postero-prolaterally extended posterior lobe; embolus originates from ca 9 o′clock position, curved into almost C-shaped, abruptly narrowed and tapered at distal 1 / 4, with pointed tip directed towards ca 1: 30 o′clock position.
Female (Fig. 8 A, B, E View Figure 8 ). Total length 4.87. Cephalothorax 2.24 long, 1.69 wide. Abdomen 2.65 long, 1.69 wide. Eye sizes and inter distances: AME 0.44, ALE 0.26, PLE 0.24, AERW 1.46, PERW 1.46, EFL 0.96. Legs: I 4.01 (1.23, 0.80, 0.90, 0.63, 0.45), II 3.81 (1.18, 0.75, 0.85, 0.60, 0.43), III 4.50 (1.50, 0.70, 0.95, 0.85, 0.50), IV 4.91 (1.50, 0.68, 1.13, 1.10, 0.50). Habitus (Fig. 8 E View Figure 8 ) similar to that of male.
Epigyne (Fig. 8 A, B View Figure 8 ): longer than wide, with pair of mediolateral hoods opened posteroventrally; atrium almost inverted trapeziform, ~ 1 / 2 epigynal length; copulatory openings inclined, slit-shaped; copulatory ducts run posteriorly with curves until slightly enlarged and forming folds at posterior portions, and then extend contrary with curves to connect to spermathecae without distinct borders; fertilization ducts extending almost transversely.
Distribution.
China ( Sichuan, Yunnan) (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ).
Etymology.
The specific name is after the famous Chinese singer, Daolang (real name Lin Luo); noun (name) in genitive case.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
